Cited by 8Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Examining men as victims of intimate partner violence in a French forensic department

Open access
Dumont, N., Martrille, L., Albuisson, E., Baland-Peltre, K., Marchand, E.·2022·Forensic Science International

Abstract

Objective Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a particular type of interpersonal violence, in which violence is performed between individuals involved in an intimate relationship. Johnson developed a typology in which he differentiates common couple violence (CCV) from intimate terrorism (IT). We led a descriptive review of the cases of men treated at the victimology unit of the forensic department of Nancy for IPV-related abuse.Method We retrospectively investigated our database to extract every file of male patient treated at the victimology unit of the forensic department of Nancy (France) from 2014 to 2019 for IPV-related abuse. We studied several parameters relating to the protagonists and their relationship, the violence endured, and the statements made during the forensic consultation. An attempt to perform Johnson's typology was made.Results We had a total of 226 consultations. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 88 years old. Almost all patients experienced physical violence. Psychological violence was noted in 138 files. Concerning Johnson's typology, we identified 92 cases consistent with the definition of CCV and 46 cases compatible with IT.Conclusion Male victims of IPV are now backed by an ever-growing corpus of studies that sheds an opportune light upon this challenging topic. Sadly, too many remain discredited and unaccounted for. We believe that escaping a gender-opposing conception in favor of a global understanding of this phenomenon would be of benefit to both men and women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111368

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. R.E. Dobash, R.P. Dobash, Violences against women, The Free Press, New York, 1979.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumont, N., Martrille, L., Albuisson, E., Baland-Peltre, K., & Marchand, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
  • Université de Montpellier (FR)
Corresponding author
Marchand, E.
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
337
Pages
111368
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283074500
Cited by
8
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
intimate partner violence, male victims, intimate terrorism, psychological violence, physical violence, forensic victimology, gender stereotypes, intimate relationships
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Physical Abuse, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Forensic Medicine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sexual Partners, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review