The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sequence-based diversity of 23 autosomal STR loci in Koreans investigated using an in-house massively parallel sequencing panel
Abstract
As DNA databases continue to grow and international cooperation increases, forensic STR loci have expanded to increase the discriminatory power and inter-database compatibility. Current capillary electrophoresis (CE) and/or massively parallel sequencing (MPS)-based commercial STR analysis systems reflect such changing trends of expanding STR loci. Due to the general gains of larger multiplexing and the detection of sequence variation, the application of MPS technology to STR analysis has further improved discrimination and is expected to aid in mixture interpretation by increasing the effective number of alleles. However, high-throughput analysis has rarely been reported for forensic DNA databasing. In this study, we present the sequencing results from 250 Korean samples at 23 commonly used STR loci (D1S1656, TPOX, D2S441, D2S1338, D3S1358, FGA, CSF1PO, D5S818, D6S1043, D7S820, D8S1179, D10S1248, TH01, vWA, D12S391, D13S317, Penta E, D16S539, D18S51, D19S433, D21S11, Penta D, and D22S1045) using an in-house assay designed for MPS. All amplicons in the multiplex exhibited a size range of 77 to 217 base pairs, and the barcoded library for the MPS run was easily prepared using a PCR-based library preparation method followed by sequencing on a MiSeq System (Illumina). We compared the STR genotyping results with those obtained using CE and scrutinized the sequence variations in both the targeted STR and flanking regions. MPS results of 23 autosomal STRs were 99.97% concordant with…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other specialized databases have been developed recently in this regard (e.g. (122–126)), starting off from human-centered research questions and expanding to examples of many other species, such as the tobacco plant (127), Trichophytum rubrum, a fungus causing skin disease (128), or the Cannabis plant to characterize the origin of hemp seeds (US Cannabis DNA database; (129)).”
From Tandem repeats lead to sequence assembly errors and impose multi-level challenges for genome and protein databases (2019) · cites this paper as [125]
Citations
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Robinson, J. T., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Winckler, W., Guttman, M., Lander, E. S., Getz, G., & Mesirov, J. P. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1754 · Cited by 15,390
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · Cited by 12,063
VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing
Koboldt, D. C., Zhang, Q., Larson, D. E., Shen, D., McLellan, M. D., Lin, L., Miller, C. A., Mardis, E. R., Ding, L., & Wilson, R. K. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.129684.111 · Cited by 4,905
Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics
Børsting, C., & Morling, N. (2015) · Forensic Science International: Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.002 · Cited by 460
Parson, W., Ballard, D., Budowle, B., Butler, J. M., Gettings, K. B., Gill, P., Gusmão, L., Hares, D. R., Irwin, J. A., King, J. L., et al. (2016) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.009 · Cited by 244
Churchill, J. D., Schmedes, S. E., King, J. L., et al. (2015) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.09.009 · Cited by 216
STR allele sequence variation: Current knowledge and future issues
Gettings, K. B., Aponte, R. A., Vallone, P. M., & Butler, J. M. (2015) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.06.005 · Cited by 205
Sequence variation of 22 autosomal STR loci detected by next generation sequencing
Gettings, K. B., Kiesler, K. M., Faith, S. A., Montano, E., Baker, C. H., Young, B. A., Guerrieri, R. A., & Vallone, P. M. (2015) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.005 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Tørresen, O. K., Star, B., Mier, P., Andrade-Navarro, M. A., Bateman, A., Jarnot, P., Gruca, A., Grynberg, M., Kajava, A. V., Promponas, V. J., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz841 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, E. H., Lee, H. Y., Kwon, S. Y., Lee, E. Y., Yang, W. I., & Shin, K.-J.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International: Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 134-140
- ISSN
- 1872-4973
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 29
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Funders
- DNA analysis of Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Republic of Korea (1333-304-260)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequence-based diversity of 23 autosomal STR loci in Koreans investigated using an in-house massively parallel sequencing panel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.07.001
- The paper
- Kim, E. H., Lee, H. Y., Kwon, S. Y., Lee, E. Y., Yang, W. I., & Shin, K.-J. (2017). Sequence-based diversity of 23 autosomal STR loci in Koreans investigated using an in-house massively parallel sequencing panel. Forensic Science International: Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.07.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
