Cited by 41Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

On the use of dense sets of SNP markers and their potential in relationship inference

Kling, Daniel·2019·Forensic Science International: Genetics

Abstract

With the advent of high density SNP arrays and the progress of next generation sequencing, demands for new methods to handle the subsequent data analysis have exploded. Forensic laboratories are generally hesitant to implement new methods in casework unless they are thoroughly tested and validated. This is particularly true when a third party contractor is involved in the analysis. In this paper we explore data from dense sets of SNP markers and study how different errors could potentially affect the results. Particularly, we study the effects of genotyping errors, linkage disequilibrium as well as the use of inappropriate population frequencies. We demonstrate that ignoring these concepts may lead to false conclusions for some different relationship cases and outline solutions to mitigate these problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.022

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kling, D.
Affiliations
Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Kling, Daniel
Venue
Forensic Science International: Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
39
Pages
19-31
ISSN
1872-4973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902462595
Cited by
41
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
relationship inference, forensic genetics, genotyping errors, linkage disequilibrium, population allele frequencies, kinship analysis, error propagation
MeSH terms
False Positive Reactions, Genetic Markers, Genetics, Population, Humans, Pedigree, Linkage Disequilibrium, Likelihood Functions, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Databases, Genetic, Forensic Genetics, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review