Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms
Abstract
An extraordinarily large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are now available in humans as well as in other model organisms. Technological advancements may soon make it feasible to assay hundreds of SNPs in virtually any organism of interest. One potential application of SNPs is the determination of pairwise genetic relationships in populations without known pedigrees. Although microsatellites are currently the marker of choice for this purpose, the number of independently segregating microsatellite markers that can be feasibly assayed is limited. Thus, it can be difficult to distinguish reliably some classes of relationship (e.g. full‐sibs from half‐sibs) with microsatellite data alone. We assess, via Monte Carlo computer simulation, the potential for using a large panel of independently segregating SNPs to infer genetic relationships, following the analytical approach of Blouin et al. (1996). We have explored a ‘best case scenario’ in which 100 independently segregating SNPs are available. For discrimination among single‐generation relationships or for the identification of parent–offspring pairs, it appears that such a panel of moderately polymorphic SNPs (minor allele frequency of 0.20) will provide discrimination power equivalent to only 16–20 independently segregating microsatellites. Although newly available analytical methods that can account for tight genetic linkage between markers will, in theory, allow improved estimation of relationships using thousands of SNPs in highly dense genomic scans, in practice such studies will only be feasible in a handful of model organisms. Given the comparable amount of effort required for the development of both types of markers, it seems that microsatellites will remain the marker of choice for relationship estimation in nonmodel organisms, at least for the foreseeable future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parentage was verified with the Glaubitz Relationship Score using a >0.37 threshold and with Graphical Representation of Relationships.
“We applied a threshold of > 0.37 to define relatedness.”
From High frequencies of de novo CNVs in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia (2011) · cites this paper as Glaubitz et al., 2003
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725 · see citing works
ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS
Queller, D. C., & Goodnight, K. F. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04226.x · Cited by 3,012 · see citing works
A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms
The International SNP Map Working Group, Laboratories:, C. S. H., Sachidanandam, R., Weissman, D., Schmidt, S. C., Kakol, J. M., Stein, L. D., National Center for Biotechnology Information:, Marth, G., Sherry, S., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057149 · Cited by 2,977 · see citing works
Wang, D. G., Fan, J., Siao, C.-J., Berno, A. J., Young, P. R., Sapolsky, R., Ghandour, G., Perkins, N., Winchester, E., Spencer, J. B., et al. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5366.1077 · Cited by 2,162 · see citing works
Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population.
(1995) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040269 · Cited by 1,950 · see citing works
Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome
Reich, D., Cargill, M., Gabriel, S., Ireland, J. S., Sabeti, P. C., Richter, D. J., Lavery, T., Kouyoumjian, R., Farhadian, S., Ward, R. H., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35075590 · Cited by 1,763 · see citing works
Estimation of Pairwise Relatedness With Molecular Markers
Lynch, M., & Ritland, K. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/152.4.1753 · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients
Ritland, K. (1996) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300033620 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification
Taberlet, P., & Luikart, G. (1999) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01157.x · Cited by 781 · see citing works
Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals
DeWoody, J. A., & Avise, J. C. (2000) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00748.x · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Estimator for Pairwise Relatedness Using Molecular Markers
Wang, J. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/160.3.1203 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Methods for Genotyping Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
Kwok, P. (2001) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.235 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Kin Selection, Social Structure, Gene Flow, and the Evolution of Chimpanzees
Morin, P. A., Moore, J. J., Chakraborty, R., Li, J., Goodall, J. R., & Woodruff, D. S. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7915048 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers
Goodnight, K. F., & Queller, D. C. (1999) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00664.x · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.
Lynch, M. (1988) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040518 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Primmer, C. R., Borge, T., Lindell, J., & Sætre, G. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01452.x · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion
Jamieson, A., & Taylor, S. C. S. (1997) · Animal Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00186.x · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness
Blouin, M. S., PARSONS, M., LACAILLE, V., & LOTZ, S. (1996) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00329.x · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Hacia, J. G., Fan, J., Ryder, O. A., Li, J., Edgemon, K., Ghandour, G., Mayer, R. A., Sun, B. K., Hsie, L., Robbins, C. M., et al. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/9674 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Statistical Tests for Detection of Misspecified Relationships by Use of Genome-Screen Data
McPeek, M. S., & Sun, L. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302800 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Similarity of DNA Fingerprints Due to Chance and Relatedness
Li, C. C., Weeks, D. E., & Chakravarti, A. (1993) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000154113 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Accurate Inference of Relationships in Sib-Pair Linkage Studies
Boehnke, M., & Cox, N. J. (1997) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/514862 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
The estimation of pairwise relationships
Thompson, E. A. (1975) · Annals of Human Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00120.x · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Marker‐inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature
Ritland, K. (2000) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00971.x · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Improved Inference of Relationship for Pairs of Individuals
Epstein, M. P., Duren, W. L., & Boehnke, M. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0002-9297(07)62952-8 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
A comparison of microsatellite‐based pairwise relatedness estimators
de Casteele, T. V., Galbusera, P., & Matthysen, E. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01288.x · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Heaton, M. P., Harhay, G. P., Bennett, G. L., STONE, R. T., Grosse, W. M., Casas, E., Keele, J. W., Smith, T. P. L., Chitko-McKown, C. G., & Laegreid, W. W. (2002) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-001-2146-3 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
The probability that related individuals share some section of genome identical by descent
Donnelly, K. P. (1983) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(83)90004-7 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the public domain: how useful are they?
Marth, G., Yeh, R. T., Minton, M. R., Donaldson, R., Li, Q., Duan, S., Davenport, R., Miller, R. D., & Kwok, P. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/86864 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
DO HARVEST REFUGES BUFFER KANGAROOS AGAINST EVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES TO SELECTIVE HARVESTING?
Tenhumberg, B., Tyre, A. J., Pople, A., et al. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-4111 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Reproductive skew among males in a female-dominated mammalian society
Engh, A. L. (2002) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/13.2.193 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Jones, A. G., & Avise, J. C. (1997) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00173.x · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: Methodology
Pamilo, P., & Crozier, R. H. (1982) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(82)90012-0 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Smith, B. R., Herbinger, C. M., & Merry, H. R. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/158.3.1329 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Estimating Quantitative Genetic Parameters Using Sibships Reconstructed From Marker Data
Thomas, S. C., & Hill, W. G. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.4.1961 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Relationship Estimation in Affected Sib Pair Analysis of Late-Onset Diseases
Göring, H. H. H., & Ott, J. (1997) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1159/000484736 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Refining the Whooping Crane Studbook by Incorporating Microsatellite DNA and Leg‐Banding Analyses
Jones, K. L., Glenn, T. C., Lacy, R. C., et al. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00001.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Taylor, A. C., Horsup, A. B., Johnson, C. N., et al. (1997) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00146.x · Cited by 96 · see citing works
POPULATION AND COLONY GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE PRIMITIVE TERMITE MASTOTERMES DARWINIENSIS
Goodisman, M. A. D., & Crozier, R. H. (2002) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00850.x · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Effectiveness of computational methods in haplotype prediction
Xu, C., Lewis, K. F., Cantone, K. L., Khan, P., Donnelly, C., White, N. J., Crocker, N., Boyd, P. R., Zaykin, D. V., & Purvis, I. J. (2001) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-001-0656-4 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Avise, J. C., & Shapiro, D. Y. (1986) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00572.x · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Female–female cooperation in polygynous oystercatchers
Heg, D., & van Treuren, R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35612 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Genetic Parentage in Large Half-Sib Clutches: Theoretical Estimates and Empirical Appraisals
DeWoody, J. A., Walker, D., & Avise, J. C. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/154.4.1907 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationOlsen, J. B. (2001) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/92.3.243 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Markov processes for modeling and analyzing a new genetic mapping method
Feingold, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Probability · doi:10.1017/s0021900200044557 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Genetic linkage in the estimation of pairwise relationship
Thompson, E. A., & Meagher, T. R. (1998) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s001220050965 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Markov processes for modeling and analyzing a new genetic mapping method
Feingold, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Probability · doi:10.2307/3214511 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
EVALUATING KINSHIP OF NEWLY SETTLED JUVENILES WITHIN SOCIAL GROUPS OF THE CORAL REEF FISH
Squamipinnis, A., Avise, J. C., & Shapiro, D. Y. (1986) · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Genealogy reconstruction from short tandem repeat genotypes in an Amazonian population.
Calafell, F., Shuster, A., Speed, W. C., Kidd, J., Black, F., & Kidd, K. (1999) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199902)108:2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Rare de novo and transmitted copy-number variation in autistic spectrum disorders
Levy, D., Ronemus, M., Yamrom, B., Lee, Y.-H., Leotta, A., Kendall, J., Marks, S., Lakshmi, B., Pai, D., Ye, K., et al. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.015 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
High frequencies of de novo CNVs in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia
Malhotra, D., McCarthy, S., Michaelson, J. J., Vacic, V., Burdick, K. E., Yoon, S., Cichon, S., Corvin, A., Gary, S., Gershon, E. S., et al. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.007 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
“Based on this test, first-degree relative pairs (i.e., mother-child and father-child) were clearly distinguishable from the distribution of GRS scores for unrelated individuals (i.e., mother-father pairs) as shown in Figure S2.”
InfluentialOn the use of dense sets of SNP markers and their potential in relationship inference
Kling, D. (2019) · Forensic Science International: Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.022 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Glaubitz, J. C., Rhodes, O. E., & Dewoody, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glaubitz, Jeffrey C.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-28
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1039-1047
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2150374976
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- single nucleotide polymorphisms, microsatellite markers, relationship inference, minor allele frequency, genetic linkage, non-model organisms, population genetics
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Pedigree, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review