Cited by 187CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Dissolution of serpentine using recyclable ammonium salts for CO2 mineral carbonation

Wang, Xiaolong, Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes·2011·Fuel

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., & Maroto-Valer, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiaolong
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
1229-1237
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116508914
Cited by
187
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fuel (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre for Innovation in Carbon Capture and Storage
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/F012098/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
CO2 mineral carbonation, ammonium bisulfate, magnesium extraction, dissolution kinetics, rate-limiting processes, activation energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review