Cited by 69Subcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesMining and Gasification TechnologiesCoal Properties and Utilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sulfur transformation in coal during supercritical water gasification

Meng, Nan, Jiang, Dandan, Liu, Yang, Gao, Zhiyuan, Cao, Yaqin, Zhang, Jinli, Gu, Junjie, Han, You·2016·Fuel

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sulfur transformation pathway and mechanism of crude oil, coal, and sludge in SCWG have been studied by analyzing the sulfur forms in solid, liquid and gaseous products.

    “The sulfur transformation pathway and mechanism of crude oil [32], coal [30,33], and sludge [34,35] in SCWG have been studied by analyzing the sulfur forms in solid, liquid and gaseous products.”
  • There were differences existing in the sulfurous gases production during SCWG process.

    “Finally, there were differences existing in the sulfurous gases production during SCWG process.”
  • Current researches on sulfur transformation of different materials in SCWG were studied at relatively lower temperature range.

    “Third, the current researches on sulfur transformation of different materials in SCWG were studied at relatively lower temperature range.”
  • Meng et al. explored the sulfur transformation of coal in SCWG at temperatures ranging from 350 °C to 550 °C.

    “For instance, Meng et al. [33] explored the sulfur transformation of coal in SCWG at temperature ranging from 350 ◦C to 550 ◦C.”
  • Some researchers concluded that there were COS, CH3SH and CH3SCH3 in gaseous products during the SCWG of coal and sludge.

    “Different from them, some researchers concluded that there were COS, CH3SH and CH3SCH3 in gaseous products during the SCWG of coal [33] and sludge [34].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Jin, 2015, Hydrogen production by Zhundong coal gasification in supercritical water, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 40, 16096, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.003 · DOI
  2. Jin, 2010, Hydrogen production by coal gasification in supercritical water with a fluidized bed reactor, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 7151, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.099 · DOI
  3. Qin, 2014, Study on occurrence of sulfur in different group components of Xinyu clean coking coal, J Fuel Chem Technol, 42, 1286, 10.1016/S1872-5813(14)60050-5 · DOI
  4. Calkins, 1994, The chemical forms of sulfur in coal: a review, Fuel, 73, 475, 10.1016/0016-2361(94)90028-0 · DOI
  5. Davidson, 1994, Quantifying organic sulfur in coal. A review, Fuel, 73, 988, 10.1016/0016-2361(94)90229-1 · DOI
  6. Saikia, 2015, Ambient air quality and emission characteristics in and around a non-recovery type coke oven using high sulphur coal, Sci Total Environ, 530–531, 304, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.109 · DOI
  7. Baruah, 2006, Aqueous leaching on high sulfur sub-bituminous coals, in Assam, India, Energy Fuel, 20, 1550, 10.1021/ef049701y · DOI
  8. Wang, 2015, Effect of steam and sulfur dioxide on sulfur trioxide formation during oxy-fuel combustion, Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 43, 1, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.002 · DOI
  9. Dreher, 2013, Catalysis in supercritical water: pathway of the methanation reaction and sulfur poisoning over a Ru/C catalyst during the reforming of biomolecules, J Catal, 301, 38, 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.01.018 · DOI
  10. Saikia, 2015, Feasibility studies on cleaning of high sulfur coals by using ionic liquids, Int J Coal Sci Technol, 2, 202, 10.1007/s40789-015-0074-1 · DOI
  11. Liu, 2007, Uneven distribution of sulfurs and their transformation during coal pyrolysis, Fuel, 86, 360, 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.021 · DOI
  12. Gonsalvesh, 2012, Organic sulphur alterations in biodesulphurized low rank coals, Fuel, 97, 489, 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.02.015 · DOI
  13. Gryglewicz, 1992, The behaviour of sulphur forms during pyrolysis of low-rank coal, Fuel, 71, 1225, 10.1016/0016-2361(92)90047-R · DOI
  14. Gryglewicz, 1996, Effectiveness of high temperature pyrolysis in sulfur removal from coal, Fuel Process Technol, 46, 217, 10.1016/0378-3820(95)00061-5 · DOI
  15. Khan, 1989, Prediction of sulphur distribution products during low temperature coal pyrolysis and gasification, Fuel, 68, 1439, 10.1016/0016-2361(89)90043-4 · DOI
  16. Chen, 1999, Effects of mineral matter on products and sulfur distributions in hydropyrolysis, Fuel, 78, 713, 10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00195-1 · DOI
  17. Chen, 2013, Sulfur emission from Victorian brown coal under pyrolysis, oxy-fuel combustion and gasification conditions, Environ Sci Technol, 47, 1729, 10.1021/es303364g · DOI
  18. Qi, 2004, Sulfur release from coal in fluidized-bed reactor through pyrolysis and partial oxidation with low concentration of oxygen, Fuel, 83, 2189, 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.06.009 · DOI
  19. Qi, 2004, Desulfurization of coal through pyrolysis in a fluidized-bed reactor under nitrogen and 0.6% O2–N2 atmosphere, Fuel, 83, 705, 10.1016/j.fuel.2003.09.021 · DOI
  20. Wang, 2003, Sulfur transformations during supercritical water oxidation of a Chinese coal, Fuel, 82, 2267, 10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00167-4 · DOI
  21. Li, 1996, The variation of sulfur forms in supercritical desulfurization of coal with ethanol, Fuel Sci Technol Int, 14, 651, 10.1080/08843759608947602 · DOI
  22. Park, 2007, Sulfur removal from coal with supercritical fluid treatment, Korean J Chem Eng, 24, 314, 10.1007/s11814-007-5043-y · DOI
  23. Chen, 2015, Lignite sulfur transformation during the supercritical water gasification process, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 116, 161, 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Patwardhan, 2013, Supercritical water desulfurization of organic sulfides is consistent with free-radical kinetics, Energy Fuel, 27, 6108, 10.1021/ef401150w · DOI
  25. Ma, 2012, Kinetics behavior and sulfur transformations of iron sulfide during supercritical water oxiation, Adv Mater Res, 524–527, 1939, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.524-527.1939 · DOI
  26. Yan, 2012, Inappropriateness of the standard method in sulfur form analysis of char from coal pyrolysis, Energy Fuel, 26, 5837, 10.1021/ef301041p · DOI
  27. Zhang, 2013, Effect of the interactions between volatiles and char on sulfur transformation during brown coal upgrade by pyrolysis, Fuel, 103, 915, 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.061 · DOI
  28. Hu, 2014, The fate of sulfur during rapid pyrolysis of scrap tires, Chemosphere, 97, 102, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.037 · DOI
  29. Wang, 2014, Effect of some natural minerals on transformation behavior of sulfur during pyrolysis of coal and biomass, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 105, 284, 10.1016/j.jaap.2013.11.015 · DOI
  30. Liu, 2014, Dual role of conditioner CaO in product distributions and sulfur transformation during sewage sludge pyrolysis, Fuel, 134, 514, 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.020 · DOI
  31. Li, 2003, Transformation of sulfur forms during coal pyrolysis and partial gasification in a fixed bed reactor, J Environ Sci (China), 24, 60
  32. Cheng, 2004, Pyrolysis of a low-rank coal in sub- and supercritical water, Fuel Process Technol, 85, 921, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.034 · DOI
  33. Liu, 2011, XPS study on the change of carbon-containing groups and sulfur transformation on coal surface, J Fuel Chem Technol, 39, 81, 10.1016/S1872-5813(11)60011-X · DOI
  34. Zhang, 2011, Sulphur transformation during pyrolysis of an Australian lignite, Proc Combust Inst, 33, 1747, 10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.074 · DOI
  35. Huang, 2012, Effects of chromium ion on sulfur removal during pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis of coal, J Anal Appl Pyrol, 97, 143, 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.04.011 · DOI
  36. Jin, 2010, Heavy metals stabilization in medical waste incinerator fly ash using alkaline assisted supercritical water technology, Waste Manage Res, 28, 1133, 10.1177/0734242X10362243 · DOI
  37. Huang, 2015, Effect of H2O on pyrite transformation behavior during oxy-fuel combustion, Fuel Process Technol, 131, 458, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.12.027 · DOI
  38. Bhargava, 2009, In situ high-temperature phase transformation studies on pyrite, Fuel, 88, 988, 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.12.005 · DOI
  39. Yani, 2010, An experimental study into pyrite transformation during pyrolysis of Australian lignite samples, Fuel, 89, 1700, 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.07.025 · DOI
  40. Huang, 2015, Transformation pathway of excluded mineral pyrite decomposition in CO2 atmosphere, Fuel Process Technol, 138, 814, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.07.028 · DOI
  41. Hu, 2006, Decomposition and oxidation of pyrite, Prog Energy Combust Sci, 32, 295, 10.1016/j.pecs.2005.11.004 · DOI
  42. Zhang, 2013, Effect of supercritical water on the stability and activity of alkaline carbonate catalysts in coal gasification, J Energy Chem, 22, 459, 10.1016/S2095-4956(13)60060-1 · DOI
  43. Wang, 2015, Sulfur K-edge XANES study of sulfur transformation during pyrolysis of four coals with different ranks, Fuel Process Technol, 131, 262, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.10.038 · DOI
  44. Zhang, 2013, The effect of supercritical water on coal pyrolysis and hydrogen production: a combined ReaxFF and DFT study, Fuel, 108, 682, 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.064 · DOI
  45. Wang, 2016, Hydrogen production by partial oxidation gasification of a phenol, naphthalene, and acetic acid mixture in supercritical water, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 41, 2238, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.115 · DOI
  46. Zhao, 2015, Transformations of pyrite in different associations during pyrolysis of coal, Fuel Process Technol, 131, 304, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.11.035 · DOI
  47. He, 2014, Hydrothermal gasification of sewage sludge and model compounds for renewable hydrogen production: a review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 39, 1127, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.141 · DOI
  48. Fedyaeva, 2014, Effect of temperature on bitumen conversion in a supercritical water flow, J Supercrit Fluids, 95, 437, 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.10.009 · DOI
  49. Fedyaeva, 2016, Non-isothermal conversion of the Kashpir sulfur-rich oil shale in a supercritical water flow, J Supercrit Fluids, 109, 157, 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.11.020 · DOI
  50. Xu, 2004, Behavior of organic sulfur model compounds in pyrolysis under coal-like environment, Fuel Process Technol, 85, 1013, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.036 · DOI
  51. Liu, 2015, Release of organic sulfur as sulfur-containing gases during low temperature pyrolysis of sewage sludge, Proc Combust Inst, 35, 2767, 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.055 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Meng, N., Jiang, D., Liu, Y., Gao, Z., Cao, Y., Zhang, J., Gu, J., & Han, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • ENN (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Han, You
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
186
Pages
394-404
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515519238
Cited by
69
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fuel (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (2011AA05A201)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21576205)
  • International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2013DFG42680)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Mining and Gasification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Coal Properties and Utilization
Keywords
supercritical water gasification, coal gasification, sulfur transformation, pyrite, pyrrhotite, magnetite, organosulfur compounds, sulfones, thiophene, sulfate, sulfite, sulfide, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, radical mechanism, coal pyrolysis, coal rank, sulfur pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review