Cited by 108Multi-Criteria Decision MakingSmart Cities and TechnologiesData Quality and Management

Quality and the efficiency of data in “Smart-Cities”

Sta, Hatem Ben·2017·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2016.12.021

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sta, H. B.
Affiliations
Tunis University (TN)
Corresponding author
Sta, Hatem Ben
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
74
Pages
409-416
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564138207
Cited by
108
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
Keywords
smart cities, belief functions, Dempster-Shafer theory, imperfect data, data quality, data integration, information retrieval, uncertainty, imprecision, heterogeneous data sources, health data, Internet of Things

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review