Cited by 484Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security Solutions

Blockchain based searchable encryption for electronic health record sharing

Chen, Lanxiang, Lee, Wai-Kong, Chang, Chin-Chen, Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond, Zhang, Nan·2019·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2019.01.018

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With the rapid development of Cloud computing, the original storage way of health data has been changed.

    “With the rapid development of Cloud computing, the original storage way of health data has been changed [96].”
  • Searchable encryption (SE) which is a promising encryption technique guarantees data security, without compromising data searchability.

    “Searchable encryption (SE) which is a promising encryption technique guarantees data security, without compromising data searchability [96].”
  • Most current searchable public-key encryption (SPE) schemes are vulnerable to the adaptive leakage-exploiting attacks or unable to meet the efficiency requirements of realistic applications.

    “However, most current such schemes, particularly the searchable public-key encryption (SPE) schemes are vulnerable to the adaptive leakage-exploiting attacks or unable to meet the efficiency requirements of realistic applications [96].”
  • Chen et al.'s searchable encryption supported healthcare framework using blockchain did not demonstrate how blockchain based searchable encryption improved over the conventional.

    “How blockchain based searchable encryption improved over the conventional was not demonstrated.”
  • After its legislation in 1996, HIPAA has not undergone any major iteration, so its rules have been outdated and cannot provide much help in safeguarding against the vague threats of the present digital age.

    “After its legislation in 1966, HIPAA has not undergone any major iteration, therefore, its rules have been outdated and cannot provide much help in safeguarding against the vague threats of the present digital age [164].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L., Lee, W.-K., Chang, C.-C., Choo, K.-K. R., & Zhang, N.
Affiliations
  • Fujian Normal University (CN)
  • Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
  • Feng Chia University (TW)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
95
Pages
420-429
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910369831
Cited by
484
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 24
FWCI
87.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (61602118, 61572010, 61472074)
  • Fujian Normal University, China (IRTL1207)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2019J01329, 2017J01738)
  • Cloud Technology Endowed Professorship, USA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
searchable encryption, electronic health records, blockchain, data privacy, smart contracts, Ethereum, data leakage, access control, traceability, anti-tampering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review