Cited by 118Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesResearch, Science, and Academia

Transdisciplinarity in land use science – A review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices

Zscheischler, Jana, Rogga, Sebastian·2015·Futures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zscheischler, J., & Rogga, S.
Affiliations
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Zscheischler, Jana
Venue
Futures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
65
Pages
28-44
ISSN
0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997632816
Cited by
118
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Futures (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
Keywords
transdisciplinary research, sustainable land management, theory-practice gap, research implementation challenges, science-society collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review