Cited by 1,239Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesOptical measurement and interference techniquesMechanics and Biomechanics Studies

Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry

Leardini, Alberto, Chiari, Lorenzo, Croce, Ugo Della, Cappozzo, Aurelio·2005·Gait & Posture

Abstract

When using optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry, skin deformation and displacement causes marker movement with respect to the underlying bone. This movement represents an artifact, which affects the estimation of the skeletal system kinematics, and is regarded as the most critical source of error in human movement analysis. A comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art for assessment, minimization and compensation of the soft tissue artifact (STA) is provided. It has been shown that STA is greater than the instrumental error associated with stereophotogrammetry, has a frequency content similar to the actual bone movement, is task dependent and not reproducible among subjects and, of lower limb segments, is greatest at the thigh. It has been shown that in in vivo experiments only motion about the flexion/extension axis of the hip, knees and ankles can be determined reliably. Motion about other axes at those joints should be regarded with much more caution as this artifact produces spurious effects with magnitudes comparable to the amount of motion actually occurring in those joints. Techniques designed to minimize the contribution of and compensate for the effects of this artifact can be divided up into those which model the skin surface and those which include joint motion constraints. Despite the numerous solutions proposed, the objective of reliable estimation of 3D skeletal system kinematics using skin markers has not yet been satisfactorily achieved and greatly limits the contribution of human movement analysis to clinical practice and biomechanical research. For STA to be compensated for effectively, it is here suggested that either its subject-specific pattern is assessed by ad hoc exercises or it is characterized from a large series of measurements on different subject populations. Alternatively, inclusion of joint constraints into a more general STA minimization approach may provide an acceptable solution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.05.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skin deformation and displacement causes marker movement with respect to the underlying bone.

    “Skin deformation and displacement causes marker movement with respect to the underlying bone [46].”
  • The soft tissue artefact has a frequency content similar to the actual bone movement, is task dependent and not reproducible among subjects.

    “This soft tissue artefact has a frequency content similar to the actual bone movement, is task dependent and not reproducible among subjects [46].”
  • For lower limbs, motion about the flexion/extension axis of hips, knees and ankles can be determined reliably, but motion about other axes at those joints should be interpreted cautiously, as the soft tissue artefact produces spurious effects with amplitudes comparable to the amount of motion actually occurring in those joints.

    “For lower limbs, motion about the flexion/extension axis of hips, knees and ankles can be determined reliably, but motion about other axes at those joints should be interpreted cautiously, as the soft tissue artefact produces spurious effects with amplitudes comparable to the amount of motion actually occurring in those joints [46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leardini, A., Chiari, L., Croce, U. D., & Cappozzo, A.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Sassari (IT)
  • Foro Italico University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Leardini, Alberto
Venue
Gait & Posture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
212-225
ISSN
0966-6362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1790910337
Cited by
1,239
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 72
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gait & Posture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
Keywords
soft tissue artifacts, stereophotogrammetry, human motion analysis, skin deformation, artifact compensation, lower limb kinematics
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Movement, Photogrammetry, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review