Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry
Abstract
When using optoelectronic stereophotogrammetry, skin deformation and displacement causes marker movement with respect to the underlying bone. This movement represents an artifact, which affects the estimation of the skeletal system kinematics, and is regarded as the most critical source of error in human movement analysis. A comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art for assessment, minimization and compensation of the soft tissue artifact (STA) is provided. It has been shown that STA is greater than the instrumental error associated with stereophotogrammetry, has a frequency content similar to the actual bone movement, is task dependent and not reproducible among subjects and, of lower limb segments, is greatest at the thigh. It has been shown that in in vivo experiments only motion about the flexion/extension axis of the hip, knees and ankles can be determined reliably. Motion about other axes at those joints should be regarded with much more caution as this artifact produces spurious effects with magnitudes comparable to the amount of motion actually occurring in those joints. Techniques designed to minimize the contribution of and compensate for the effects of this artifact can be divided up into those which model the skin surface and those which include joint motion constraints. Despite the numerous solutions proposed, the objective of reliable estimation of 3D skeletal system kinematics using skin markers has not yet been satisfactorily achieved and greatly limits the contribution of human movement analysis to clinical practice and biomechanical research. For STA to be compensated for effectively, it is here suggested that either its subject-specific pattern is assessed by ad hoc exercises or it is characterized from a large series of measurements on different subject populations. Alternatively, inclusion of joint constraints into a more general STA minimization approach may provide an acceptable solution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Skin deformation and displacement causes marker movement with respect to the underlying bone.
“Skin deformation and displacement causes marker movement with respect to the underlying bone [46].”
From Neurological Tremor: Sensors, Signal Processing and Emerging Applications (2010) · cites this paper as [46]
The soft tissue artefact has a frequency content similar to the actual bone movement, is task dependent and not reproducible among subjects.
“This soft tissue artefact has a frequency content similar to the actual bone movement, is task dependent and not reproducible among subjects [46].”
From Neurological Tremor: Sensors, Signal Processing and Emerging Applications (2010) · cites this paper as [46]
For lower limbs, motion about the flexion/extension axis of hips, knees and ankles can be determined reliably, but motion about other axes at those joints should be interpreted cautiously, as the soft tissue artefact produces spurious effects with amplitudes comparable to the amount of motion actually occurring in those joints.
“For lower limbs, motion about the flexion/extension axis of hips, knees and ankles can be determined reliably, but motion about other axes at those joints should be interpreted cautiously, as the soft tissue artefact produces spurious effects with amplitudes comparable to the amount of motion actually occurring in those joints [46].”
From Neurological Tremor: Sensors, Signal Processing and Emerging Applications (2010) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AMASS: Archive of Motion Capture As Surface Shapes
Mahmood, N., Ghorbani, N., Troje, N. F., Pons-Moll, G., & Black, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00554 · Cited by 1,323 · see citing works
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.025 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Robert-Lachaine, X., Mecheri, H., Larue, C., & Plamondon, A. (2017) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-016-1537-2 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Inertial Measurement Units for Clinical Movement Analysis: Reliability and Concurrent Validity
Al-Amri, M., Nicholas, K., Button, K., Sparkes, V., Sheeran, L., & Davies, J. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18030719 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Ceseracciu, E., Sawacha, Z., & Cobelli, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087640 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Neurological Tremor: Sensors, Signal Processing and Emerging Applications
Grimaldi, G., & Manto, M. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100201399 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
“…axis of hips, knees and ankles can be determined reliably, but motion about other axes at those joints should be interpreted cautiously, as the soft tissue artefact produces spurious effects with amplitudes comparable to the amount of motion actually occurring in those joints [46].”
BackgroundInfluentialBouvier, B., Duprey, S., Claudon, L., Dumas, R., & Savescu, A. (2015) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s150818813 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Use of wearable sensor technology in gait, balance, and range of motion analysis
Díaz, S., Stephenson, J. B., & Labrador, M. A. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10010234 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Teufl, W., Miezal, M., Taetz, B., Fröhlich, M., & Bleser, G. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213064 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Blair, S., Duthie, G., Robertson, S., Hopkins, W., & Ball, K. (2018) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.03.031 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
On-field player workload exposure and knee injury risk monitoring via deep learning
Johnson, W. R., Mian, A., Lloyd, D. G., & Alderson, J. A. (2019) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.002 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Lebel, K., Boissy, P., Nguyen, H., & Duval, C. (2017) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-017-0347-6 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Bonnet, V., Mazzà, C., McCamley, J., & Cappozzo, A. (2013) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-29 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Leardini, A., Chiari, L., Croce, U. D., & Cappozzo, A.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- University of Sassari (IT)
- Foro Italico University of Rome (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Leardini, Alberto
- Venue
- Gait & Posture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 212-225
- ISSN
- 0966-6362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1790910337
- Cited by
- 1,239
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gait & Posture (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Optical measurement and interference techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
- Keywords
- soft tissue artifacts, stereophotogrammetry, human motion analysis, skin deformation, artifact compensation, lower limb kinematics
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Movement, Photogrammetry, Artifacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review