Cited by 167Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older AdultsGait Recognition and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults

Open access

Abstract

Objectives Gait variability is an important indicator of impaired mobility in older adults; however, little is known about the meaning of change in gait variability over time. This study estimated clinically meaningful change in measures of gait variability using both distribution- and anchor-based approaches.Design Community-based observational cohort study.Setting Bronx County and the research center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.Participants Of 1148 participants in the Einstein Aging Study, 241 had quantitative gait assessments in two consecutive years between 2001 and 2005.Measurements Gait variables were collected using a 12-foot instrumented walkway as participants walked at their normal walking speed. Gait variability was defined as the within-person standard deviation (SD) across steps in two 12-foot walks. Distribution-based meaningful change estimates used Cohen's effect size (0.2 for small and 0.5 for moderate effects). Anchor-based estimates were obtained using dichotomous and ordinal self-reported walking ability ratings as anchors.Results Distribution-based estimates for small and substantial changes of variability measures were: stance time 0.005 and 0.014 s; swing time 0.003 and 0.009 s; step length 0.24 and 0.61 cm; and step width 0.03 and 0.08 cm. Among those reporting no change in walking ability, measures of gait variability were stable over 1 year. Among those reporting a decline in walking, stance time and swing time variability increased. Among those reporting an improvement in walking, only step length variability improved.Conclusion Preliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01 s for stance time and swing time variability and 0.25 cm for step length variability. These estimates may identify important changes over time in both clinical settings and research studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.002

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brach, J. S., Perera, S., Studenski, S., Katz, M., Hall, C., & Verghese, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Brach, Jennifer S.
Venue
Gait & Posture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
175-179
ISSN
0966-6362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153210735
Cited by
167
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gait & Posture (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag025119-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG025119, AG03949, K23AG026766, P01AG003949, P30AG024827)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
gait variability, meaningful change, older adults, mobility impairment, stance time, swing time, step length, step width, walking ability, Einstein Aging Study
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Gait, Health Status, Humans, Male, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Comorbidity, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review