Cited by 51MicroRNA in disease regulationGene expression and cancer classificationBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Tree-based machine learning algorithms identified minimal set of miRNA biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis and molecular subtyping

Sherafatian, Masih·2018·Gene

Abstract

Breast cancer is a complex disease and its effective treatment needs affordable diagnosis and subtyping signatures. While the use of machine learning approach in clinical computation biology is still in its infancy, the prevalent approach in identifying molecular biomarkers remains to be screening of all biomarkers by differential expression analysis. Many of these attempts used miRNAs expression data in breast cancer and amounted to the multitude of differentially expressed miRNAs in this cancer; hence, the minimal set of miRNA biomarkers to classify breast cancer is yet to be identified. Availability of diverse and vast amount of cancer datasets like The Cancer Genome Atlas facilitated the molecular profiling of patients' tumors and introduced new challenges like clinical grade interpretations from big data. In this study, miRNA expression dataset of breast cancer patients from TCGA database was used to develop prediction models from which miRNA biomarkers were identified for diagnosis and molecular subtyping of this cancer. I took the advantage of interpretability of tree-based classification models to extract their rules and identify minimal set of biomarkers in this cancer. Empirical negative control miRNAs in breast cancer obtained and used to normalize the dataset. Tree-based machine learning models trained in my analysis used hsa-miR-139 with hsa-miR-183 to classify breast tumors from normal samples, and hsa-miR4728 with hsa-miR190b to further classify these tumors into three major subtypes of breast cancer. In addition to the proposed biomarkers, the most important miRNAs in breast cancer classification were also presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gene.2018.07.057

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherafatian, M.
Affiliations
Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Corresponding author
Sherafatian, Masih
Venue
Gene
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
677
Pages
111-118
ISSN
0378-1119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884508733
Cited by
51
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
breast cancer, microRNA biomarkers, molecular subtyping, breast cancer diagnosis, tree-based classification, model interpretability, tumor classification
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Biomarkers, Tumor, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs, Molecular Typing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review