Cited by 39Electronic Health Records SystemsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research Topics

Furthering the reliable and valid measurement of mental health screening, diagnoses, treatment and outcomes through health information technology

Open access
Haberer, Jessica E., Trabin, Tom, Klinkman, Michael·2013·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Introduction Measurement of mental health is challenging; however, many solutions may be found through the use of health information technology.Method This article reviews current approaches to measuring mental health, focusing on screening, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. It then identifies several key areas in which health information technology may advance the field and provide reliable and valid measurements that are readily available to and manageable for providers, as well as acceptable, feasible, and sustainable for selected populations.Result and conclusions Although new technologies must overcome many challenges, including privacy, efficiency, cost, and scalability, it is an exciting and fast-growing field with many potential applications and clinical benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.009

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [67]Seidman E A framework for measurement feedback to improve decisionmaking in mental health Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2011 37 1–2 128 131 20041342 PMC2874030

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haberer, J. E., Trabin, T., & Klinkman, M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
349-353
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019196399
Cited by
39
References
79
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (#290-09-00036U)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH087228)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
mental health measurement, mental health screening, psychiatric diagnosis, psychotherapy, treatment outcomes, health information technology, reliability and validity, privacy, scalability, feasibility
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mass Screening, Medical Informatics, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review