Cited by 139Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Psychosocial treatments of suicidal behaviors: A practice‐friendly review

Comtois, Katherine Anne, Linehan, Marsha M.·2006·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Worldwide, almost a million people die by suicide each year. Intentional, nonfatal, self‐inflicted injury, including both suicide attempts and acts without suicide intent, also has very high prevalence. This article provides a practice‐friendly review of controlled studies of psychosocial treatments aiming to prevent suicide, attempted suicide, and nonsuicidal self‐inflicted injuries. Despite relatively small sample sizes for a low‐base‐rate outcome such as self‐inflicted injury, several psychotherapies have been found effective, including cognitive therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, problem‐solving therapy, and interpersonal psychotherapy, as well as outreach interventions, such as sending caring letters. The clinical implications of the review are discussed with the goal of translating the science to service—particularly the importance of outreach and treatment of non‐compliance, the assessment and management of suicide risk, and competency in effective psychotherapies. These are critical steps for clinical psychology and psychotherapists to take in their role in suicide prevention. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol: In Session 62: 161–170, 2006.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.20220

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The participants in this study strongly endorsed maladaptive beliefs associated with personality disorders, especially borderline and avoidant beliefs, to a greater extent than even patients with borderline personality disorder.

    “However, the participants in our study strongly endorsed maladaptive beliefs associated with personality disorders, especially borderline and avoidant beliefs (further information available from the authors), to a greater extent than even patients with borderline personality disorder, 49”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Comtois, K. A., & Linehan, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Linehan, Marsha M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-12-09
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
161-170
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W1990615104
Cited by
139
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
suicide prevention, psychosocial interventions, suicide attempts, non-suicidal self-injury, cognitive therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, problem-solving therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, suicide risk assessment, treatment non-adherence
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Humans, Psychology, Psychology, Clinical, Psychotherapy, United States, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review