Cited by 29Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Pilot randomized clinical trial of the Teachable Moment Brief Intervention for hospitalized suicide attempt survivors.

O'Connor, Stephen S., Mcclay, Michael M., Choudhry, Shujah, Shields, Angela D., Carlson, Richard, Alonso, Yaima, Lavin, Kyle, Venanzi, Lisa +3 more·2020·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to further evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the Teachable Moment Brief Intervention (TMBI).Method A single blind, pilot randomized controlled trial of the TMBI + care as usual (CAU) compared to CAU was conducted for patients who survived a recent suicide attempt that required medical inpatient hospitalization. The intervention was delivered on medical/surgical and inpatient psychiatry units in the medical center. Interviews were completed at baseline, 1, 3, and 12 months.Results Patients reported high ratings of satisfaction with the TMBI. Interventionists representing fields of Psychiatry, Social Work, and Counseling were able to deliver the intervention with fidelity to the treatment manual with equal adherence ratings. The TMBI patients were more likely to maintain a positive recovery trajectory on motivation and engagement in mental health services at 3 months.Conclusion The TMBI provides an option for targeted intervention to health care providers as they engage patients admitted to an acute medical setting after a serious suicide attempt. This is the second pilot study demonstrating enhanced motivation in the post-hospitalization period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.08.001

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Connor, S. S., Mcclay, M. M., Choudhry, S., Shields, A. D., Carlson, R., Alonso, Y., Lavin, K., Venanzi, L., Comtois, K. A., Wilson, J. E., & Nicolson, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Western Kentucky University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US)
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
63
Pages
111-118
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885407792
Cited by
29
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (YIG-0-098-13)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
suicide attempt survivors, hospitalized patients, brief psychological intervention, treatment acceptability, intervention feasibility, intervention fidelity, patient satisfaction, post-hospitalization recovery, psychiatric inpatient care
MeSH terms
Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Brief, Suicide, Attempted, Single-Blind Method, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review