Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In general, providers are more vulnerable than users to biased reviews.
“Our review suggests that in general, providers are more vulnerable than users to biased reviews (Cockayne, 2016).”
From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Cockayne, 2016
Cites
A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276411424420 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Labor in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet
Fuchs, C. (2010) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972241003712215 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Sharing Versus Pseudo-Sharing in Web 2.0
Belk, R. (2014) · The Anthropologist · doi:10.1080/09720073.2014.11891518 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 · Cited by 1,354 · see citing works
The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability
Curtis, S. K., & Lehner, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030567 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis
Tan, Z. M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101594 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The Superhost. Biopolitics, home and community in the Airbnb dream-world of global hospitality
Roelofsen, M., & Minca, C. (2018) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.021 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Crandall, J. (2019) · Design and Culture · doi:10.1080/17547075.2019.1673989 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cockayne, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Cockayne, Daniel G.
- ORCID
- Cockayne, Daniel G.
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 73-82
- ISSN
- 0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2531726695
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 11
- FWCI
- 60.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoforum (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Kentucky
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Keywords
- sharing economy, on-demand economy, neoliberalism, digital platforms, flexible work arrangements, precarious employment, algorithmic labor, software developers, Uber, Airbnb, San Francisco
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
