Cited by 209Climate Change Communication and PerceptionEnvironmental and sustainability educationEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Disempowering emotions: the role of educational experiences in social responses to climate change

Open access
Jones, Charlotte A., Davison, Aidan·2021·Geoforum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.11.006

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, C. A., & Davison, A.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Jones, Charlotte A.
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
118
Pages
190-200
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108121803
Cited by
209
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17
FWCI
22.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geoforum (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and sustainability education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
climate change education, affective learning, emotions, disempowerment, young adults, intergenerational differences, climate change attitudes, climate change response, powerlessness, fear of the future, public engagement with climate change, social division

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review