CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Urban Planning and Landscape DesignUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisUrban Development and Cultural Heritage

The social connectivity of urban rivers

Kondolf, G. Mathias, Pinto, Pedro J.·2017·Geomorphology
DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.028

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Global South, traditional forms of land-uses, community experiences, and emotional linkages between humans and nature remain often quite vivid in the memory of the people, which can be built upon to re-create the social connectivity of urban rivers.

    “In the context of the Global South traditional forms of land-uses, community experiences, emotional linkages between humans and nature, etc., remain often quite vivid in the memory of the people, a situation which can be built upon to re-create the social connectivity of urban rivers [15,16].”

    From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Memories or still-existing usages of ecosystem services, engraved into a use culture, enable humans to develop emotional affection to rivers and to prioritize conservation and restoration of aquatic ecosystem functions, which foster biological and cultural diversities and re-establish social connectivity.

    “Ideally, there are memories or still-existing usages of the services of the ecosystem, which are engraved into a “use culture”, enabling humans to develop an emotional affection to rivers [165] and to prioritize the conservation and restoration of aquatic ecosystem functions, which foster both biological and cultural diversities (River Culture Concept, Wantzen et al., 2016 [13]) and to re-est”

    From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Kondolf, G. M., & Pinto, P. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Kondolf, G. Mathias
ORCID
Venue
Geomorphology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
277
Pages
182-196
ISSN
0169-555X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.028
OpenAlex
W2520550016
Cited by
168
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Geomorphology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Development and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
urban rivers, social connectedness, river connectivity, river width, waterfront use, river recreation, river transport, urban form, human-river relationship, vertical connectivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review