Cited by 23Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Unlocking the sorption mechanism of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) on geosynthetics: Case of the geotextile components of geosynthetic clay liners

Open access
Mikhael, Elissar, Bouazza, Abdelmalek, Gates, Will P., Haque, Asadul·2024·Geotextiles and Geomembranes

Abstract

We present here an experimental investigation on the sorption of four perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs): namely, two perfluorocarbonic acids (PFCAs) – perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA); and two perfluorosulfonic acids – perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and, perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) to polypropylene cover and carrier geotextiles commonly used in geosynthetic clay liners. The impacts of various operational parameters, such as sorbent mass, contact time, and initial PFAA concentration, were investigated. A bi-exponential adsorption model was observed to describe the adsorption kinetics for all PFAAs sufficiently. The model indicates two (probably physically) different types of adsorption sites involved in the PFAAs adsorption. The Freundlich and Langmuir equations well represented the adsorption isotherms. Furthermore, it was observed that PFAA sorption was strongly dependent on the end functional groups and perfluorinated carbon chain length of PFAAs. The maximum adsorption capacities for all PFAAs on geotextiles were consistent with results obtained for clay minerals, indicating that, in the absence of sufficient organic matter, sorption of PFAAs onto solids is mainly analyte and solution dependent. The results obtained and reported for the first time herein are imperative for understanding the fate and migration of PFAAs in modern geosynthetic composite liner systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.09.002

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mikhael, E., Bouazza, A., Gates, W. P., & Haque, A.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bouazza, Abdelmalek
Venue
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
59-71
ISSN
0266-1144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386696850
Cited by
23
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geotextiles and Geomembranes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl acids, geosynthetic clay liners, geotextiles, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid, PFOS, PFBS, adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherms, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, landfill liners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review