Cited by 176Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Why are agri-food systems resistant to new directions of change? A systematic review

Conti, Costanza, Zanello, Giacomo, Hall, Andy·2021·Global Food Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100576

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 150 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conti, C., Zanello, G., & Hall, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Conti, Costanza
Venue
Global Food Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
31
Pages
100576
ISSN
2211-9124 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199765801
Cited by
169
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Food Security (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
CGIAR
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
agri-food systems, resistance to change, lock-in, path dependence, sustainability transitions, food security, institutional environment, political economy, innovation priorities, transformative change, temporal dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review