Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,024

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward

Yildiz, Mete·2007·Government Information Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Agranoff, R. (2004, March). Inside the operation: Building grounded network theory. Paper presented at the American Society for Public Administration National Conference, Portland, OR.
  2. Aldrich, 2002, E-government: initiatives, developments, and issues, Government Information Quarterly, 19, 349, 10.1016/S0740-624X(02)00130-2 · DOI
  3. Bauer, 2000, Quantitative evaluation of web site content and structure, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10, 31, 10.1108/10662240010312138 · DOI
  4. Bekkers, 1999, Electronic service delivery in public administration: Some trends and issues, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 65, 183, 10.1177/0020852399652004 · doi:10.1177/0020852399652004
  5. Bozeman, 1986, Public management information systems: Theory and prescription, Public Administration Review, 46, 475, 10.2307/975569 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bretschneider, 2003, Information technology, e-government and institutional change, Public Administration Review, 63, 738, 10.1111/1540-6210.00337 · DOI
  7. Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J. L. (2001, October). Achieving advanced electronic government services: An examination of obstacles and implications from an international perspective. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.
  8. Brown, 2003, Learning organizations in the public sector? A study of police agencies employing information and technology to advance knowledge, Public Administration Review, 63, 30, 10.1111/1540-6210.00262 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cullen, 2000, Democracy online: An assessment of New Zealand government Web sites, Government Information Quarterly, 17, 243, 10.1016/S0740-624X(00)00033-2 · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(00)00033-2
  10. Danziger, 2004, Innovation in innovation: The technology enactment framework, Social Science Computer Review, 22, 100, 10.1177/0894439303259892 · DOI
  11. Danziger, 2002, The impacts of information technology on public administration: An analysis of empirical research from the “golden age” of transformation, International Journal of Public Administration, 25, 591, 10.1081/PAD-120003292 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Doty, 2002, Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: Methods and issues for E-government, Government Information Quarterly, 19, 369, 10.1016/S0740-624X(02)00121-1 · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(02)00121-1
  13. Feinberg, 2004, FOIA, federal information policy, and information availability in a post-9/11 world, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 439, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.004 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.004
  14. Gant, J. P., & Gant, D. B. (2002). Web Portal Functionality and State Government E-Services, Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 2002.
  15. Garson, 2003, Technological teleology and the theory of technology enactment, Social Science Computer Review, 21, 425, 10.1177/0894439303256371 · doi:10.1177/0894439303256371
  16. Gellman, 2004, Privacy and security: Assessing database derivative activities, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 498, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.005 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.005
  17. Ghere, 1998, The cyber-management environment: Where technology and ingenuity meet public purpose and accountability, Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 3
  18. Gil-Garcia, 2005, E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations, Government Information Quarterly, 22, 187, 10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Goodsell, 1997, Administration as ritual, International Journal of Public Administration, 20, 939, 10.1080/01900699708525227 · doi:10.1080/01900699708525227
  20. Grafton, 2003, ‘Shadow theories’ in Fountain's theory of technology enactment, Social Science Computer Review, 21, 411, 10.1177/0894439303256567 · doi:10.1177/0894439303256567
  21. Grant, 2005, Developing a generic framework for e-government, Journal of Global Information Management, 13, 1, 10.4018/jgim.2005010101 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Halchin, 2004, Electronic government: Government capability and terrorist resource, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 406, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.002 · DOI
  23. Heeks, R. (1999a). Information technology, government and development: Workshop report. Available at: http://idpm.man.ac.uk/idpm/itgovsem.htm. Accessed March 12, 2003.
  24. Hernon, 1998, Government on the Web: A comparison between the United States and New Zealand, Government Information Quarterly, 15, 419, 10.1016/S0740-624X(98)90034-X · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(98)90034-x
  25. Ho, 2002, Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative, Public Administration Review, 62, 434, 10.1111/0033-3352.00197 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hwang, 1999, Electronic government in South Korea: Conceptual problems, Government Information Quarterly, 16, 277, 10.1016/S0740-624X(99)80028-8 · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(99)80028-8
  27. Jaeger, 2002, Constitutional principles and e-government: An opinion about possible effects of Federalism and separation of powers on e-government policies, Government Information Quarterly, 19, 357, 10.1016/S0740-624X(02)00119-3 · DOI
  28. Jaeger, 2003, The endless wire: E-Government as a global phenomenon, Government Information Quarterly, 20, 323, 10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Jonas, 2000, Building state information highways: Lessons for public and private sector leaders, Government Information Quarterly, 17, 43, 10.1016/S0740-624X(99)00026-X · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(99)00026-x
  30. King, 2004, Rob Kling and the Irvine school, The Information Society, 20, 97, 10.1080/01972240490422978 · DOI
  31. Kraemer, 1989, Curriculum recommendations for public management education in computing: An update, Public Administration Review, 49, 447, 10.2307/976389 · doi:10.2307/976389
  32. Layne, 2001, Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model, Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122, 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Lev, 2000, Knowledge management: Fad or need, Research Technology Management, 43, 9, 10.1080/08956308.2000.11671372 · doi:10.1080/08956308.2000.11671372
  34. Lissack, 2000, Knowledge management redux: Reframing a consulting fad into a practical tool, Emergence, 2, 78, 10.1207/S15327000EM0203_07 · doi:10.1207/s15327000em0203_07
  35. Mahmood, 2004, Can information and communication technology help reduce corruption: How so and why not? Two case studies from Southeast Asia, Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 3, 347, 10.1163/1569150042442539 · doi:10.1163/1569150042442539
  36. McClure, 2000, The Chief Information Officer (CIO): Assessing its impact, Government Information Quarterly, 17, 7, 10.1016/S0740-624X(99)00021-0 · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(99)00021-0
  37. McGregor, E. B., Jr. (2001). Web page accountability: The case of public schools. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.
  38. Miller, 2002, Spotting management fads, Harvard Business Review, 80, 26
  39. Norris, 2003, Building the virtual state … or not: A critical appraisal, Social Science Computer Review, 21, 417, 10.1177/0894439303256728 · doi:10.1177/0894439303256728
  40. Norris, 2005, Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare, Public Administration Review, 65, 64, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. Regan, 2004, Old issues, new contexts: Privacy, information collection and homeland security, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 481, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.003 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.003
  42. Relyea, 2000, Paperwork Reduction Act reauthorization and government information management issues, Government Information Quarterly, 17, 367, 10.1016/S0740-624X(00)00048-4 · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(00)00048-4
  43. Relyea, 2004, Homeland security and information sharing: Federal policy considerations, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 420, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.007 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.007
  44. Seifert, 2004, Data mining and the search for security: Challenges for connecting the dots and databases, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 461, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.006 · DOI
  45. Seifert, 2004, Do you know where your information is in the homeland security era, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 399, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.001 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.001
  46. Stowers, 1999, Becoming cyberactive: State and local governments on the World Wide Web, Government Information Quarterly, 16, 111, 10.1016/S0740-624X(99)80003-3 · DOI
  47. Stowers, 2003, Information technology and its social dimensions, Public Administration Review, 63, 243, 10.1111/1540-6210.00283 · doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00283
  48. Torres, 2005, E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities, Government Information Quarterly, 22, 217, 10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Westerback, 2000, Toward best practices for strategic information technology management, Government Information Quarterly, 17, 27, 10.1016/S0740-624X(99)00023-4 · DOI
  50. Whitson, 2001, Best practices in electronic government: Comprehensive electronic information dissemination for science and technology, Government Information Quarterly, 18, 7, 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00062-4 · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00062-4
  51. Yang, 2003, Neoinstitutionalism and e-Government: Beyond Jane Fountain, Social Science Computer Review, 21, 432, 10.1177/0894439303256508 · DOI
  52. Yildiz, M. (2004). Peeking into the black box of e-government policy-making: The case of Turkey. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Public Affairs Program, Indiana University-Bloomington.

Cited by

See all 1,024

Metadata

Authors
Yildiz, M.
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
646-665
ISSN
0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
OpenAlex
W1966340945
Cited by
1,024
References
1
FWCI
263.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
The paper
Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.