Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information

Jaeger, Paul T., Bertot, John Carlo·2010·Government Information Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Bertot, 2006, Public access computing and Internet access in public libraries: The role of public libraries in e-government and emergency situations, First Monday, 11, 10.5210/fm.v11i9.1392 · DOI
  2. Bertot, 2006, Drafted: I want you to deliver e-government, Library Journal, 131, 34
  3. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & McClure, C. R. (2008). User-centered e-government services: Benefits, costs, and research needs. Paper presented at the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.
  4. Bertot, 2009, Reconciling government documents and e-government: Government information in policy, librarianship, and education, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 433, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.002 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.002
  5. Burnett, 2008, The social aspects of information access: The viewpoint of normative theory of information behavior, Library & Information Science Research, 30, 56, 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.07.003 · DOI
  6. Burroughs, 2009, What users want: Assessing government information preferences to drive information services, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 203, 10.1016/j.giq.2008.06.003 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.06.003
  7. Chadwick, 2001, The electronic face of government in the Internet age: borrowing from Murray Edelman, Information, Communication & Society, 4, 435, 10.1080/13691180110069482 · doi:10.1080/13691180110069482
  8. Chadwick, 2003, Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: ‘E-government’ in the United States, Britain, and the European Union, Governance, 16, 271, 10.1111/1468-0491.00216 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Coleman, 2004, Connecting Parliament to the public via the Internet, Information, Communication & Society, 7, 1, 10.1080/1369118042000208870 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cullier, 2009, Internet information-seeking and its relation to support for access to government records, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 441, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fuchs, 2006, Judging secrets: The role courts should play in preventing unnecessary secrecy, Administrative Law Review, 58, 131
  12. Gibson, A. N., Bertot, J. C., & McClure, C. R. (2009). Emerging roles of public libraries as e-government providers. Paper presented at the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences.
  13. Ho, 2004, Explaining the adoption of e-government features: A case study of Iowa County Treasurers’ offices, American Review of Public Administration, 34, 164, 10.1177/0275074004264355 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jaeger, 2005, Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government, Government Information Quarterly, 22, 702, 10.1016/j.giq.2006.01.012 · DOI
  15. Jaeger, 2007, Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration's information politics, Government Information Quarterly, 24, 840, 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.004 · DOI
  16. Jaeger, 2009, The fourth branch of government and the historical legacy of the Bush administration's information policies, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 311, 10.1016/j.giq.2007.12.004 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.12.004
  17. Jaeger, 2009, E-government education in public libraries: New service roles and expanding social responsibilities, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50, 40
  18. Jaeger, 2010, Designing, implementing, and evaluating user-centered and citizen-centered e-government, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6, 1, 10.4018/jegr.2010040101 · DOI
  19. Jaeger, 2005, Information access and exchange among small worlds in a democratic society: The role of policy in redefining information behavior in the post-9/11 United States, Library Quarterly, 75, 464, 10.1086/502787 · DOI
  20. Jaeger, 2009, E-government and technology acceptance: The implementation of Section 508 guidelines for e-government websites, Electronic Journal of E-Government, 7, 87
  21. Jaeger, 2010, Information policy in national political campaigns: A comparison of the 2008 campaigns for President of the United States and Prime Minister of Canada, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 1, 10.1080/19331680903316700 · DOI
  22. Jaeger, 2003, E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and new directions, Government Information Quarterly, 20, 389, 10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Jaeger, 2004, Social information behavior and the democratic process: Information poverty, normative behavior, and electronic government in the United States, Library & Information Science Research, 26, 94, 10.1016/j.lisr.2003.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kierkegaard, 2009, Open access to public documents—more secrecy, less transparency!, Computer Law & Security Review, 25, 3, 10.1016/j.clsr.2008.12.001 · DOI
  25. Mahler, 2006, Crafting the message: Controlling content on agency Web sites, Government Information Quarterly, 24, 505, 10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.008 · DOI
  26. Mulgan, 2007, Truth in government and the politicization of public service advice, Public Administration, 85, 569, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00663.x · DOI
  27. Priebe, 2008, The U.S. Government Printing Office's initiatives for the Federal Depository Library Program to set the stage for the 21st century, Government Information Quarterly, 25, 48, 10.1016/j.giq.2007.09.003 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.09.003
  28. Quinn, 2003, Keeping the citizenry informed: Early congressional printing and 21st century information policy, Government Information Quarterly, 20, 281, 10.1016/S0740-624X(03)00055-8 · DOI
  29. Relly, 2009, Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 148, 10.1016/j.giq.2008.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Relyea, 2009, Federal freedom of information policy: Highlights of recent developments, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 314, 10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.001 · DOI
  31. Relyea, 2009, Congress and freedom of information: A retrospective and a look at a current issue, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 437, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.04.001 · DOI
  32. Shuler, 2010, Implications of harmonizing e-government principles and the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), Government Information Quarterly, 27, 9, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.09.001 · DOI
  33. Singh, 2008, Integrating Internet, telephones, and call centers for delivering better quality e-governance to all citizens, Government Information Quarterly, 25, 477, 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.001 · DOI
  34. Tsai, 2009, Improving the process of e-government initiative: An in-depth case study of web-based GIS implementation, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 368, 10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.007 · DOI
  35. von Furstenberg, 2001, Hopes and delusions of transparency, North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12, 105, 10.1016/S1062-9408(01)00040-7 · DOI

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C.
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
371-376
ISSN
0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003
OpenAlex
W2063165121
Cited by
420
References
0
FWCI
130.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003
The paper
Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.