The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software
O’Reilly, T. (2012) · The Social Media Reader · doi:10.18574/nyu/9780814764077.003.0008 · Cited by 5,601
The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2783 · Cited by 2,869
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Gender Differences in Negative Campaigning: The Impact of Party Environments
Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Dolezal, M., & Müller, W. C. (2017) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x16000532 · Cited by 1,627
Applied imagination : principles and procedures of creative problem-solving /
Osborn, A. F. (1963) · Cited by 1,445
The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004 · Cited by 817
Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
(2024) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2024.000 · Cited by 646
Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government
Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-2010-0205 · Cited by 574
Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice
Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010) · Cited by 528
Cited by
Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001 · Cited by 503
Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170067 · Cited by 466
Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government
Mergel, I. (2013) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004 · Cited by 447
Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook?
Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., & del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816645652 · Cited by 373
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-07-2019-0178 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 504-511
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009718190
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 189.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002
- The paper
- Picazo-Vela, S., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2012). Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
