Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 817

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations

Bertot, John Carlo, Jaeger, Paul T., Hansen, Derek·2012·Government Information Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (in press). Promoting transparency and accountably through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy.
  2. Bertot, 2010, Engaging the public in open government: The policy and government application of social media technology for government transparency, IEEE Computer, 43, 53, 10.1109/MC.2010.325 · DOI
  3. Bertot, 2009, Reconciling government documents and e-government: Government information in policy, librarianship, and education, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 433, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.002 · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.002
  4. Brabham, 2008, Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases, Convergence, 14, 75, 10.1177/1354856507084420 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Burnett, 2003, Beyond the FAQ: Implicit and explicit norms in Usenet newsgroups, Library and Information Science Research, 25, 333, 10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00033-1 · DOI
  6. Burnett, 2004, Information exchange in virtual communities: A comparative study, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00286.x · DOI
  7. Carlson, 2004, Left out online: Electronic media should be a boon for people with disabilities, but few colleges embrace the many new technologies that could help, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, A23
  8. Corbridge, 2007, The (im)possibility of development studies, Economy and Society, 36, 179, 10.1080/03085140701264869 · DOI
  9. Dobransky, 2006, The disability divide in internet access and use, Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313, 10.1080/13691180600751298 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Harper, 2008, A quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions, Internet and Higher Education, 11, 160, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.007 · DOI
  11. Jaeger, 2010, Designing, implementing, and evaluating user-centered and citizen-centered e-government, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6, 1, 10.4018/jegr.2010040101 · DOI
  12. Jaeger, 2011, Responsibility rolls down: Public libraries and the social and policy obligations of ensuring access to e-government and government information, Public Library Quarterly, 30, 1, 10.1080/01616846.2011.575699 · DOI
  13. Jaeger, 2010, The Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), academic libraries, and access to government information, Journal of Academic of Librarianship, 36, 469, 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.002 · DOI
  14. Jaeger, 2008, Cloud computing and information policy: Computing in a policy cloud?, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5, 269, 10.1080/19331680802425479 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jaeger, 2009, Where is the cloud? Geography, economics, environment, and jurisdiction in cloud computing, First Monday, 14, 10.5210/fm.v14i5.2456 · DOI
  16. Jaeger, 2010, Information policy in national political campaigns: A comparison of the 2008 campaigns for President of the United States and Prime Minister of Canada, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7, 1, 10.1080/19331680903316700 · DOI
  17. Jaeger, 2003, E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and new directions, Government Information Quarterly, 20, 389, 10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Jaeger, 2004, Social information behavior and the democratic process: Information poverty, normative behavior, and electronic government in the United States, Library and Information Science Research, 26, 94, 10.1016/j.lisr.2003.11.006 · DOI
  19. Johnston, E. W., & Hansen, D. L. (in press). Design lessons for smart governance infrastructures. In D. Ink, A. Balutis, & T. Buss (Eds.), American Governance 30 Rebooting the Public Square. New York: M.E. Sharp.
  20. Lazar, 2011, Reducing barriers to online access for people with disabilities, Issues in Science and Technology, 17, 68
  21. Maloney-Krichmar, 2005, A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability and community dynamics in an online health community, Transactions on Human–Computer Interaction, 12, 1, 10.1145/1067860.1067864 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Noveck, 2008, Wiki-government, Vol. 7
  23. Paquette, 2010, Identifying the risks associated with governmental use of cloud computing, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 245, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pirolli, 2010, Cyberinfrastructure for social action on national priorities, Computer, 43, 20, 10.1109/MC.2010.315 · DOI
  25. Powell, 2010, The essential internet: Digital exclusion in low-income American communities, Policy & Internet, 2, 10.2202/1944-2866.1058 · DOI
  26. Shuler, 2010, Implications of harmonizing e-government principles and the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), Government Information Quarterly, 27, 9, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.09.001 · DOI
  27. Tepper, 2003, The rise of social software, NetWorker, 7, 18, 10.1145/940830.940831 · DOI

Cited by

See all 817

Metadata

Authors
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D.
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
30-40
ISSN
0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
OpenAlex
W2075068230
Cited by
817
References
2
FWCI
284.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
The paper
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.