The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency
Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510533 · Cited by 752
Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television?
Baum, M. A., & Kernell, S. (1999) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585763 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication
Holmberg, K., & Thelwall, M. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3 · Cited by 289
A survey of Twitter research: Data model, graph structure, sentiment analysis and attacks
Antonakaki, D., Fragopoulou, P., & Ioannidis, S. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114006 · Cited by 265
Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.004 · Cited by 152
Public deliberation on government-managed social media: A study on Weibo users in China
Medaglia, R., & Zhu, D. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.003 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, S., & Nadler, D.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 455-461
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038151193
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004
- The paper
- Hong, S., & Nadler, D. (2012). Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
