Cited by 433Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate variability and modelsClimate Change Policy and Economics

Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama?

Brysse, Keynyn, Oreskes, Naomi, O’Reilly, Jessica, Oppenheimer, Michael·2013·Global Environmental Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.008

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brysse, K., Oreskes, N., O’Reilly, J., & Oppenheimer, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • St. John's University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Brysse, Keynyn
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
327-337
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979746235
Cited by
433
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 9
FWCI
61.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Carbon Mitigation Initiative
  • National Science Foundation (#0958378)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change prediction, anthropogenic climate change, greenhouse gas forcing, Arctic ozone depletion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review