Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation
Open accessAbstract
As the world considers greener forms of economic growth, countries and sectors are beginning to position themselves for the emerging green economy. This paper combines patent data with international trade and output data in order to investigate who the winners of this “green race” might be. The analysis covers 110 manufacturing sectors in eight countries (China, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, UK and the US) using date for the period 2005–2007. We identify three success factors for green competitiveness at the sector level: the speed at which sectors convert to green products and processes (measured by green innovation), their ability to gain and maintain market share (measured by existing comparative advantages) and a favourable starting point (measured by current output). We find that the green race is likely to alter the present competitiveness landscape. Many incumbent country-sectors with strong comparative advantages today lag behind in terms of green conversion, suggesting that they could lose their competitive edge. Japan, and to a lesser extent Germany, appear best placed to benefit from the green economy, while other European countries (Italy in particular) could fall behind. However, the green economy is much broader than the few flagship sectors on which the debate tends to focus, and each country has its niches of green competitiveness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There may be a first mover advantage for green technologies.
“There may be a first mover advantage for ‘green’ technologies (Beise & Rennings, Citation2005; Fankhauser et al., Citation2013; Oberndorfer & Rennings, Citation2006).”
From Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms' competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2019) · cites this paper as Fankhauser et al., 2013
Cites
Economic development as self-discovery
Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(03)00124-x · Cited by 1,840 · see citing works
Is There a Case for Industrial Policy? A Critical Survey
Pack, H. (2006) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/lkl001 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, Y., Liu, S., Shao, X., & He, Y. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111779 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1502145 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fankhauser, S., Bowen, A., Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A., Grover, D., Rydge, J., & Sato, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (GB)
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 902-913
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2243731871
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 23.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
- UK Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
- Keywords
- green economy, environmental competitiveness, green innovation, comparative advantage, market share, manufacturing industry, patent information, international trade, incumbent firms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review