Cited by 204Global Trade and CompetitivenessEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Development and Policies

Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation

Open access
Fankhauser, Sam, Bowen, Alex, Calel, Raphael, Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Grover, David, Rydge, James, Sato, Misato·2013·Global Environmental Change

Abstract

As the world considers greener forms of economic growth, countries and sectors are beginning to position themselves for the emerging green economy. This paper combines patent data with international trade and output data in order to investigate who the winners of this “green race” might be. The analysis covers 110 manufacturing sectors in eight countries (China, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, UK and the US) using date for the period 2005–2007. We identify three success factors for green competitiveness at the sector level: the speed at which sectors convert to green products and processes (measured by green innovation), their ability to gain and maintain market share (measured by existing comparative advantages) and a favourable starting point (measured by current output). We find that the green race is likely to alter the present competitiveness landscape. Many incumbent country-sectors with strong comparative advantages today lag behind in terms of green conversion, suggesting that they could lose their competitive edge. Japan, and to a lesser extent Germany, appear best placed to benefit from the green economy, while other European countries (Italy in particular) could fall behind. However, the green economy is much broader than the few flagship sectors on which the debate tends to focus, and each country has its niches of green competitiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fankhauser, S., Bowen, A., Calel, R., Dechezleprêtre, A., Grover, D., Rydge, J., & Sato, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
902-913
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2243731871
Cited by
204
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
23.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
  • UK Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
Keywords
green economy, environmental competitiveness, green innovation, comparative advantage, market share, manufacturing industry, patent information, international trade, incumbent firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review