Cited by 15Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Quality and ManagementHealth Services Management and Policy

Linking research to practice: The organisation and implementation of The Netherlands health and social care improvement programmes

Øvretveit, John, Klazinga, Niek·2013·Health Policy

Abstract

Both public and private health and social care services are facing increased and changing demands to improve quality and reduce costs. To enable local services to respond to these demands, governments and other organisations have established large scale improvement programmes. These usually seek to enable many services to make changes to apply proven improvements and to make use of quality improvement methods. The purpose of this paper is to provide an empirical description of how one organisation coordinated ten national improvement programmes between 2004 and 2010. It provides details which may be useful to others seeking to plan and implement such programmes, and also contributes to the understanding of knowledge translation and of network governance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.11.005

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Øvretveit, J., & Klazinga, N.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Øvretveit, John
Venue
Health Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
175-186
ISSN
0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981566323
Cited by
15
References
38
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
knowledge translation, network governance, program implementation, quality improvement, research-practice linkage, health care organization
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Netherlands, Quality of Health Care, Social Work, Program Development, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review