Cited by 108ECG Monitoring and AnalysisPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial intelligence for early prediction of pulmonary hypertension using electrocardiography

Kwon, Joon-myoung, Kim, Kyung-Hee, Medina-Inojosa, Jose, Jeon, Ki-Hyun, Park, Jinsik, Oh, Byung-Hee·2020·The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Abstract

Background Screening and early diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) are critical for managing progression and preventing associated mortality; however, there are no tools for this purpose. We developed and validated an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for predicting PH using electrocardiography (ECG). Methods This historical cohort study included data from consecutive patients from 2 hospitals. The patients in one hospital were divided into derivation (56,670 ECGs from 24,202 patients) and internal validation (3,174 ECGs from 3,174 patients) datasets, whereas the patients in the other hospital were included in only an external validation (10,865 ECGs from 10,865 patients) dataset. An AI algorithm based on an ensemble neural network was developed using 12-lead ECG signal and demographic information from the derivation dataset. The end-point was the diagnosis of PH. In addition, the interpretable AI algorithm identified which region had the most significant effect on decision making using a sensitivity map. Results During the internal and external validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the AI algorithm for detecting PH was 0.859 and 0.902, respectively. In the 2,939 individuals without PH at initial echocardiography, those patients that the AI defined as having a higher risk had a significantly higher chance of developing PH than those in the low-risk group (31.5% vs 5.9%, p Conclusions The AI algorithm demonstrated high accuracy for…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healun.2020.04.009

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–108 of 108

Metadata

Authors
Kwon, J.-M., Kim, K.-H., Medina-Inojosa, J., Jeon, K.-H., Park, J., & Oh, B.-H.
Affiliations
Sejong General Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Kyung-Hee
Venue
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
805-814
ISSN
1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013435687
Cited by
108
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
pulmonary hypertension, electrocardiogram, artificial intelligence, early prediction, neural network ensembles, explainable AI, sensitivity maps, 12-lead ECG, single-lead ECG, risk stratification, echocardiography
MeSH terms
Aged, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Neural Networks, Computer, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review