Cited by 5Transplantation: Methods and OutcomesCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Survival difference between high-risk and low-risk CFTR genotypes after lung transplant

Open access
Clausen, Emily S., Weber, Jeremy M., Neely, Megan L., Ramos, Kathleen J., Snyder, Laurie D.·2022·The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Abstract

Background While cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) genotypes are associated with clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis patients, it is unknown if genotype impacts lung transplant outcomes. We sought to compare lung transplant survival and time to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) between high-risk, low-risk, and not yet classified CFTR genotypes.Methods We used merged data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (2005-2017) and United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (2005-2016). Cox Proportional Hazards models compared graft failure after lung transplant and time to BOS among high-risk, low-risk, and not yet classified risk CFTR genotype classes.Results Among 1,830 cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients, median survival for those with low-risk, high-risk, and not yet classified genotype was 9.83, 6.25, and 5.75 years, respectively. Adjusted Cox models showed recipients with a low-risk genotype had 39% lower risk of death or re-transplant compared to those with high-risk genotype (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI = 0.40, 0.91). A subset of 1,585 lung transplant recipients were included in the BOS subgroup analysis. Adjusted analyses showed no significant difference of developing BOS among high-risk, low-risk, or not yet classified genotypes.Conclusions Lung transplant recipients with low-risk CFTR genotype have better survival after transplant compared to recipients with high-risk or not yet classified genotypes. Given these differences, future studies evaluating the mechanism by which CFTR genotype affects post-transplant survival could identify potential targets for intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healun.2022.04.009

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our findings were consistent with the results of Clausen et al. following re-transplant.

    “Our findings were consistent with these results following re-transplant.”

    From Cystic fibrosis survival outcomes following second lung transplant: The north American experience (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion reports better graft survival for recipients with low-risk than high-risk CFTR genotypes. However, the Methods (Study cohort) specify that the study included patients undergoing their first lung transplant; it does not report survival following re-transplant. The Results (Graft Failure Analysis) count re-transplant as part of a graft-failure outcome, not as the starting point for a survival analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pre-transplant factors known to be associated with mortality following first lung transplant include B. cepacia complex, year of transplant, and CFTR functional class, while male sex and age at transplant were of borderline significance.

    “Pre-transplant factors known to be associated with mortality following first lung transplant include B. cepacia complex, year of transplant, and CFTR functional class while male sex and age at transplant were of borderline significance.7,8”

    From Cystic fibrosis survival outcomes following second lung transplant: The north American experience (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results (Graft Failure Analysis; page not provided) associate CFTR genotype classification and a history of Burkholderia cepacia complex with graft failure, defined as death or retransplant. They do not identify transplant year or male sex as associated factors. Nor do they describe age at transplant as borderline significant: age was significantly associated with graft failure at 35 years or younger, but not above 35. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clausen et al. found that individuals with high-risk genotypes (functional class I-III) had worse survival following first lung transplant compared to those with at least one Class IV or V mutation.

    “When looking at survival by genotype, Clausen et al. recently published a study showing that individuals with high-risk genotypes (categorized by functional class I-III) had worse survival following first lung transplant compared to those with at least one Class IV or V mutation.8”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clausen, E. S., Weber, J. M., Neely, M. L., Ramos, K. J., & Snyder, L. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Clausen, Emily S.
Venue
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
1511-1519
ISSN
1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225264651
Cited by
5
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2023-05-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • CHEST Foundation
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  • United Network for Organ Sharing
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, CFTR genotype, lung transplantation, post-transplant survival, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, graft failure, retransplantation
MeSH terms
Bronchiolitis Obliterans, Cystic Fibrosis, Genotype, Humans, Retrospective Studies, United States, Lung Transplantation, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review