Cited by 2,195Cystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

A CFTR Potentiator in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and the G551D Mutation

Open access
Ramsey, Bonnie W., Davies, Jane, McElvaney, N. Gerard, Tullis, Elizabeth, Bell, Scott C., Dřevínek, Pavel, Griese, Matthias, McKone, Edward F. +11 more·2011·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing the activity of defective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein is a potential treatment for cystic fibrosis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate ivacaftor (VX-770), a CFTR potentiator, in subjects 12 years of age or older with cystic fibrosis and at least one G551D-CFTR mutation. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg of ivacaftor every 12 hours (84 subjects, of whom 83 received at least one dose) or placebo (83, of whom 78 received at least one dose) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the estimated mean change from baseline through week 24 in the percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). RESULTS: The change from baseline through week 24 in the percent of predicted FEV(1) was greater by 10.6 percentage points in the ivacaftor group than in the placebo group (P<0.001). Effects on pulmonary function were noted by 2 weeks, and a significant treatment effect was maintained through week 48. Subjects receiving ivacaftor were 55% less likely to have a pulmonary exacerbation than were patients receiving placebo, through week 48 (P<0.001). In addition, through week 48, subjects in the ivacaftor group scored 8.6 points higher than did subjects in the placebo group on the respiratory-symptoms domain of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-revised instrument (a 100-point scale, with higher numbers indicating a lower effect of symptoms on the patient's quality of life) (P<0.001). By 48 weeks, patients treated with ivacaftor had gained, on average, 2.7 kg more weight than had patients receiving placebo (P<0.001). The change from baseline through week 48 in the concentration of sweat chloride, a measure of CFTR activity, with ivacaftor as compared with placebo was -48.1 mmol per liter (P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar with ivacaftor and placebo, with a lower proportion of serious adverse events with ivacaftor than with placebo (24% vs. 42%). CONCLUSIONS: Ivacaftor was associated with improvements in lung function at 2 weeks that were sustained through 48 weeks. Substantial improvements were also observed in the risk of pulmonary exacerbations, patient-reported respiratory symptoms, weight, and concentration of sweat chloride. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and others; VX08-770-102 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00909532.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1105185

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ivacaftor and tezacaftor-ivacaftor are approved therapies with well-characterized safety profiles.

    “Ivacaftor and tezacaftor–ivacaftor, two components of this triple combination, are approved therapies, with well-characterized safety profiles.10-12,30”

    From Elexacaftor–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor for Cystic Fibrosis with a Single Phe508del Allele (2019) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Discussion reports that 48 weeks of ivacaftor was not associated with greater safety risk than placebo, supporting the ivacaftor safety portion. This paper does not establish approval status or address the safety of tezacaftor–ivacaftor; it describes ivacaftor as investigational at the time of the study. Page numbers were not supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior data with CFTR modulators show comparable safety data across numerous CF genotypes.

    “prior data with CFTR modulators showing comparable safety data across numerous CF genotypes.7,8,28”

    From Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial (2019) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results (Safety and Adverse-Event Profile; page not provided) report similar adverse-event incidence with ivacaftor and placebo, supporting comparable safety in this trial. But the Results (Subjects; page not provided) identify a study population selected for the G551D mutation; the paper does not establish comparable safety across numerous CF genotypes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The majority of phase 3 trials assessing the efficacy of CFTR modulators have used treatment periods of 24 weeks or longer.

    “The majority of phase 3 trials assessing the efficacy of CFTR modulators have used treatment periods of 24 weeks or longer”

    From Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial (2019) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Methods (Study Oversight and Study Subjects; page unavailable) describe a phase 3 trial of the CFTR potentiator ivacaftor with a 48-week treatment period. This supports one example of a trial lasting at least 24 weeks, but the paper does not establish that a majority of phase 3 CFTR-modulator trials did so. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Short-term changes in lung function have consistently been demonstrated within 4 weeks of treatment with CFTR modulators in previous randomised controlled trials.

    “observations that short-term changes in lung function have consistently been demonstrated within 4 weeks of treatment with CFTR modulators in previous randomised controlled trials”

    From Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial (2019) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Results > Clinical Efficacy section reports a significant improvement in FEV1 by day 15 in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of ivacaftor, supporting a lung-function change within four weeks. This paper reports one CFTR potentiator trial; it does not establish that such early changes were consistently demonstrated across previous trials of CFTR modulators. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CFTR modulators treat the underlying cause of disease and improve clinical outcomes in persons with specific CFTR mutations.

    “CFTR modulators treat the underlying cause of disease and have improved clinical outcomes in persons with specific CFTR mutations.9-12”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [2]Farrell PM The prevalence of cystic fibrosis in the European Union J Cyst Fibros 2008 7 450 3 18442953
  2. [3]Gibson RL Burns JL Ramsey BW Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003 168 918 51 14555458
  3. [4]Rowe SM Miller S Sorscher EJ Cystic fibrosis N Engl J Med 2005 352 1992 2001 15888700
  4. [5]Welsh MJ Ramsey BW Accurso FJ Cutting GR Scriver CR Beaudet AR Sly W Valle D Cystic fibrosis The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease 8 New York McGraw-Hill 2001 521 88
  5. [6]Kerem B Rommens JM Buchanan JA Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis Science 1989 245 1073 80 2570460
  6. [7]Riordan JR Rommens JM Kerem B Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA Science 1989 245 1066 73 [Erratum, Science 1989;245:1437.] 2475911
  7. [8]LeGrys VA Sweat analysis proficiency testing for cystic fibrosis Pediatr Pulmonol 2000 30 476 80 11109060
  8. [9]McKone EF Emerson SS Edwards KL Aitken ML Effect of genotype on phenotype and mortality in cystic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study Lancet 2003 361 1671 6 12767731
  9. [10]Van Goor F Hadida S Grootenhuis PD Rescue of CF airway epithelial cell function in vitro by a CFTR potentiator, VX-770 Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 106 18825 30 19846789 PMC2773991
  10. [11]Accurso FJ Rowe SM Clancy JP Effect of VX-770 in persons with cystic fibrosis and the G551D-CFTR mutation N Engl J Med 2010 363 1991 2003 21083385 PMC3148255
  11. [12]Farrell PM Rosenstein BJ White TB Guidelines for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns through older adults: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus report J Pediatr 2008 153 S4 S14 18639722 PMC2810958
  12. [13]Knudson RJ Lebowitz MD Holberg CJ Burrows B Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging Am Rev Respir Dis 1983 127 725 34 6859656
  13. [14]Fuchs HJ Borowitz DS Christiansen DH Effect of aerosolized recombinant human DNase on exacerbations of respiratory symptoms and on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis N Engl J Med 1994 331 637 42 7503821
  14. [15]Quittner AL Buu A Messer MA Modi AC Watrous M Development and validation of The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire in the United States: a health-related quality-of-life measure for cystic fibrosis Chest 2005 128 2347 54 16236893
  15. [16]Welsh MJ Smith AE Molecular mechanisms of CFTR chloride channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis Cell 1993 73 1251 4 7686820
  16. [17]Ramsey BW Pepe MS Quan JM Intermittent administration of inhaled tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis N Engl J Med 1999 340 23 30 9878641
  17. [18]Elkins MR Robinson M Rose BR A controlled trial of long-term inhaled hypertonic saline in patients with cystic fibrosis N Engl J Med 2006 354 229 40 16421364
  18. [19]Flume PA O’Sullivan BP Robinson KA Cystic fibrosis pulmonary guidelines: chronic medications for maintenance of lung health Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007 176 957 69 17761616
  19. [20]Sanders DB Bittner RC Rosenfeld M Hoffman LR Redding GJ Goss CH Failure to recover to baseline pulmonary function after cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010 182 627 32 20463179 PMC5450763
  20. [21]Quittner AL Modi AC Wainwright C Otto K Kirihara J Montgomery AB Determination of the minimal clinically important difference scores for the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory symptom scale in two populations of patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infection Chest 2009 135 1610 8 19447923 PMC2821291
  21. [22]Saiman L Marshall BC Mayer-Hamblett N Azithromycin in patients with cystic fibrosis chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2003 290 1749 56 14519709
  22. [23]Saiman L Anstead M Mayer-Hamblett N Effect of azithromycin on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis uninfected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2010 303 1707 15 20442386
  23. [24]Durie PR Pencharz PB A rational approach to the nutritional care of patients with cystic fibrosis J R Soc Med 1989 82 Suppl 16 11 20 2657050 PMC1291914
  24. [25]Rich DP Anderson MP Gregory RJ Expression of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator corrects defective chloride channel regulation in cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells Nature 1990 347 358 63 1699126
  25. [26]Goss CH Mayer-Hamblett N Kronmal RA Williams J Ramsey BW Laboratory parameter profiles among patients with cystic fibrosis J Cyst Fibros 2007 6 117 23 16829217

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramsey, B. W., Davies, J., McElvaney, N. G., Tullis, E., Bell, S. C., Dřevínek, P., Griese, M., McKone, E. F., Wainwright, C. E., Konstan, M. W., Moss, R., Ratjen, F., Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Rowe, S. M., Dong, Q., Rodriguez, S., Yen, K., Ordoñez, C., & Elborn, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE)
  • Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2011-11-03
Volume
365
Issue
18
Pages
1663-1672
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2140868856
Cited by
2,195
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 171 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 177 · 2018: 156 · 2017: 166 · 2016: 157 · 2015: 174 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 144 · 2012: 93
FWCI
100.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (P30 DK27651)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics
  • University of Pennsylvania (UL1 RR024134)
  • University of Washington (UL1 RR025014)
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh (UL1RR024153, RR024153)
  • Case Western Reserve University (UL1RR024989)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (RR025777)
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals
  • University of Alabama
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Imperial College London
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr025777-04, DK2765 1, RR025014, RR025777, 5UL1 RR025777, RR024153, RR024989)
  • Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL105487)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK027651, K23DK075788, P30DK072482, P30DK089507)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5UL 1RR025777, RR 024989, UL1RR024989, RR-024153, UL1RR025005, UL1RR025744, UL1-RR-025777, RR025005, UL1RR025758, UL1RR024153, UL1RR025014, UL1RR024134)
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, CFTR potentiators, ivacaftor, G551D mutation, CFTR modulator therapy, lung function, FEV1, pulmonary exacerbations, sweat chloride, quality of life, weight gain, adverse events, children and adolescents, drug safety and efficacy, respiratory symptoms
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aminophenols, Child, Cystic Fibrosis, Drug Synergism, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Quinolones, Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review