Cited by 120Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Music Perception

Auditory and auditory-tactile processing in congenitally blind humans

Hötting, Kirsten, Röder, Brigitte·2009·Hearing Research

Abstract

Studying blind humans is an excellent opportunity to investigate how experience might shape auditory processing. In everyday life, blind humans rely more on auditory information than sighted humans to recognize people, localize events, or process language. A growing number of studies have provided evidence that the increased use of the auditory system results in compensatory behavior in the blind. Blind humans perform better in perceptual auditory tasks, like pitch or duration discrimination, and in auditory language and memory tasks. Neural plasticity at different levels of the auditory processing stream has been linked to these behavioral benefits. In everyday life, many events stimulate more than one sensory system. Multisensory research has cumulated evidence that the integration of information across modalities facilitates perception and action control. Neurophysiological correlates of multisensory interactions have been described for various subcortical and cortical areas. There is evidence that vision plays a pivotal role in setting up multisensory functions during ontogeny. This article summarizes evidence for a reorganization of multisensory brain areas and reduced crossmodal interactions on the behavioral level following congenital visual deprivation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heares.2009.07.012

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hötting, K., & Röder, B.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Hötting, Kirsten
Venue
Hearing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
258
Issue
1-2
Pages
165-174
ISSN
0378-5955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153051391
Cited by
120
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
congenital blindness, auditory processing, multisensory integration, cross-modal interaction, neuroplasticity, visual deprivation, auditory perception, tactile perception, auditory memory, pitch discrimination, duration discrimination, brain reorganization
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Physiological, Auditory Perception, Blindness, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Language, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Touch, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review