Cited by 43Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Auditory, tactile, and audiotactile information processing following visual deprivation

Occelli, Valeria, Spence, Charles, Zampini, Massimiliano·2013·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

We highlight the results of those studies that have investigated the plastic reorganization processes that occur within the human brain as a consequence of visual deprivation, as well as how these processes give rise to behaviorally observable changes in the perceptual processing of auditory and tactile information. We review the evidence showing that visual deprivation affects the establishment of the spatial coordinate systems involved in the processing of auditory and tactile inputs within the peripersonal space around an individual. In blind individuals, the absence of a conjoint activation of external coordinate systems across modalities co-occurs with a higher capacity to direct auditory and tactile attentional resources to different spatial locations and to ignore irrelevant distractors. Both processes could thus contribute to the reduced spatial multisensory binding that has been observed in those who are blind. The interplay between auditory and tactile information in visually deprived individuals is modulated by attentional factors. Blind individuals typically outperform sighted people in those tasks where the target is presented in one sensory modality (and the other modality acts as a distractor). By contrast, they are less efficient in tasks explicitly requiring the combination of information across sensory modalities. The review highlights how these behavioral effects are subserved by extensive plastic changes at the neural level, with brain areas traditionally involved in visual functioning switching and being recruited for the processing of stimuli within the intact residual senses. We also discuss the roles played by other intervening factors with regard to compensatory mechanisms, such as previous visual experience, age at onset of blindness, and learning effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028416

Cites

284 of 284 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vision may be necessary for successful cross-calibration.

    “Vision may be necessary for successful cross-calibration (Hötting & Röder, 2009; Occelli et al., 2013; Wallace et al., 2004).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Occelli et al., 2013

  • Loss of vision may affect the establishment of peripersonal spatial coordinates, that then affects haptic and auditory processing.

    “Occelli et al. (2013) highlight that loss of vision may affect the establishment of peripersonal spatial coordinates, that then affects haptic and auditory processing.”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Occelli et al., 2013

  • Visual experience is important for the development of a representation of the environment even for another sense, consistent with crossmodal calibration.

    “What this may mean is that visual experience is important for the development of a representation of the environment even for another sense, consistent with the idea of crossmodal calibration (Gori et al., 2010; Occelli et al., 2013).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Occelli et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Occelli, V., Spence, C., & Zampini, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2013-01
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
189-212
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2012653026
Cited by
43
References
284
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
visual deprivation, blindness, auditory attention, tactile attention, multisensory integration, peripersonal space, spatial coordinate system, multisensory binding, attentional capture, distractor suppression, neuroplasticity, cross-modal plasticity, learning effects
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Blindness, Humans, Mental Processes, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review