Cited by 422Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMultisensory perception and integration

Pitch discrimination in the early blind

Gougoux, Frédéric, Lepore, Franco, Lassonde, Maryse, Voss, Patrice, Zatorre, Robert J., Belin, Pascal·2004·Nature

Abstract

Do blind people develop superior abilities in auditory perception to compensate for their lack of vision? They are known to be better than sighted people at orientating themselves by sound, but it is not clear whether this enhanced awareness extends to other auditory domains, such as listening to music or to voices. Here we show that blind people are better than sighted controls at judging the direction of pitch change between sounds, even when the speed of change is ten times faster than that perceived by the controls--but only if they became blind at an early age. The younger the onset of blindness, the better is the performance, which is in line with cerebral plasticity being optimal during the early years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/430309a

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of one perceptual channel can be compensated for by higher resolution activity in another.

    “Such evidence suggests that the loss of one perceptual channel can be compensated for by higher resolution activity in another (Gougoux et al., 2004; Stevens & Weaver, 2009).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Gougoux et al., 2004

  • Early blind outperform the sighted in pitch discrimination.

    “On the other hand, the early blind outperform the sighted in pitch discrimination (Gougoux et al., 2004) and also show better temporal resolution for auditory stimuli (Muchnick et al., 1991; Stevens & Weaver, 2009).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Gougoux et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gougoux, F., Lepore, F., Lassonde, M., Voss, P., Zatorre, R. J., & Belin, P.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Belin, Pascal
Venue
Nature
Published
2004-07-15
Volume
430
Issue
6997
Pages
309-309
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1977007664
Cited by
422
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
pitch discrimination, early blindness, auditory perception, neuroplasticity, music perception, voice perception
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aging, Blindness, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Neuronal Plasticity, Pitch Perception, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review