Cited by 133COVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Resilience effects in food consumption behaviour at the time of Covid-19: perspectives from Italy

Open access
Cavallo, Carla, Sacchi, Giovanna, Carfora, Valentina·2020·Heliyon

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic lead Italy to undertake a severe lockdown for almost two months. All of a sudden, the lives of Italians were forced to shift in accordance with the regulations issued by government. This change in the lives of Italians can be mirrored by an adjustment in food consumer behaviour that, consequently, brought about a transition in the whole supply chain. This paper gives an overview of the recent changes in consumption patterns that occurred due to the Italian lockdown, and how evolutions in behaviour are intertwined with the evolution of the main food supply chains. Many of the events here depicted are likely to last far beyond the crisis and affect the subsequent evolution of food consumption in Italy. The Italian retail supply chain successfully adapted to the big shift in consumption. Despite purchases for essential items having increased, no stockout harmed the food security of Italians. Out-of-home consumption moved inside houses giving space to home meal preparation and comfort food. Home delivery has been the most important element in this context, as it boomed during this period, helping laggard consumers fill the digital divide, as it was mostly mediated by e-commerce platforms and instant messaging. It was also the leverage that allowed small retailers and small producers regain their space. This crisis calls for a more sustainable food system that will be increasingly oriented to moving goods rather than people, which will also have relevance in the coming years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05676

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-identity positively impacts healthy food purchase intention.

    “Self-identity emerges as a significant predictor of healthy food purchase intention, maintaining its influence even when controlling for other psychological and social factors within the theory of the planned behavior framework [37,81,102].”

    From Psychological Determinants of Healthy Food Purchase Intention: An Integrative Model Based on Health Consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Introduction discusses hedonic and utilitarian buying motives, while the Discussion describes changes in food preferences during the Italian lockdown; neither addresses self-identity as a predictor of healthy-food purchase intention. Searches for self-identity, healthy-food purchase intention, and the theory of planned behavior found no passage supporting the attributed relationship. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. ISMEA Emergenza COVID–19 2° Rapporto sulla domanda e l’offerta dei prodotti alimentari nell’emergenza Covid-19 Vol. 2 2020
  2. ISMEA Emergenza COVID–19 3° Rapporto sulla domanda e l’offerta dei prodotti alimentari nell’emergenza Covid-19 Vol. 3 2020
  3. ISMEA Emergenza COVID–19 Rapporto sulla domanda e l’offerta dei prodotti alimentari nelle prime settimane di diffusione del virus Vol. 1 2020
  4. Nouh F. Elfagi S. Omar M. Corona virus: the paradox between food insecurity and weight gain EAS Journal of Nutr. Food Sci. 2 2020 39 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavallo, C., Sacchi, G., & Carfora, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Sacchi, Giovanna
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
e05676
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113250690
Cited by
133
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 26
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Libera Università di Bolzano
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, food consumption behaviour, food supply chain, food retail, food security, home cooking, comfort food, home delivery, e-commerce, digital divide, small retailers, sustainable food systems, Italy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review