Cited by 217Economics of Agriculture and Food MarketsCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Consumer food stockpiling behavior and willingness to pay for food reserves in COVID-19

Open access
Wang, Erpeng, An, Ning, Gao, Zhifeng, Kiprop, Emmanuel, Geng, Xianhui·2020·Food Security

Abstract

Consumer behavior changes differently in emergencies. Understanding consumer food stockpiling behavior during COVID-19 pandemic can provide critical information for governments and policymakers to adjust inventory and response strategies. This paper analyzed consumer food stockpiling behavior, including the change of food reserve scale and willingness to pay for fresh food reserves in COVID-19. Our paper shows that the scale of food reserve extends from 3.37 to 7.37 days after the outbreak of COVID-19; if available, consumers on average are willing to pay 18.14 yuan (60.47%) premium for fresh products reserves. The result shows that food stockpiling behavior is fueled by a set of multiple motivations and subjective risk perception. Female, high education level and high-income consumers were more likely to reserve larger scale food reserves, but consumers’ willingness to pay for fresh food reserves is determined by income. This study was conducted when new infection cases continued to rise in the world. The story of food stockpiling during the COVID-19 pandemic in China is similar with the rest of world. Consumer stockpiling behavior in China can also be expanded to other countries to predict the change of food demand and understand more about consumer preferences in emergencies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12571-020-01092-1

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current literature from the pandemic has found that the ability to pay for fresh food is associated with higher incomes.

    “Current literature from the pandemic has found that the ability to pay for fresh food is associated with higher incomes [35].”

    From Material Hardship and Stress from COVID-19 in Immigrant Chinese American Families with Infants (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results (Table 2; page unavailable) show a positive association between the highest income category and willingness to pay for fresh-food reserves during COVID-19. The Methodology describes this as a hypothetical price-choice survey for a package of reserves, not a measure of consumers’ actual ability to pay for fresh food generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, E., An, N., Gao, Z., Kiprop, E., & Geng, X.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Tech University (CN)
  • Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Geng, Xianhui
Venue
Food Security
Published
2020-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
739-747
ISSN
  • 1876-4517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-4525
OpenAlex
W3047185142
Cited by
217
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 9
FWCI
36.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Security (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Jiangsu Office of Philosophy and Social Science
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (CARS-28, 71903088)
  • Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (CARS-28)
  • China Agricultural Research System (CARS‐28)
  • National Social Science Fund of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
food hoarding, consumer behavior, willingness to pay, food reserves, COVID-19 pandemic, disaster preparedness, risk perception, demographic factors, food demand, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review