Cited by 152Human Resource and Talent ManagementManagement and Organizational PracticesEmployer Branding and e-HRM

Aligning strategic human resource management and person–environment fit

Werbel, James D., DeMarie, Samuel M.·2005·Human Resource Management Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.10.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werbel, J. D., & DeMarie, S. M.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Werbel, James D.
Venue
Human Resource Management Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
247-262
ISSN
1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058293039
Cited by
152
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Resource Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
strategic human resource management, person-environment fit, vertical linkages, horizontal connections, organizational competencies, business strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review