CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 88Human Resource and Talent ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessManagement and Organizational Studies

Sustainable HRM: An extension of the paradox perspective

Poon, Teresa Shuk-Ching, Law, Kuok Kei·2022·Human Resource Management Review
DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100818
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100818

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work remains largely silent on finding solutions to address tensions and paradoxes embedded in seeking simultaneous performance in economic, social, and environmental domains.

    “Prior work remains largely silent on finding solutions to address tensions and paradoxes that are inevitably embedded in seeking simultaneous performance in economic, social, and environmental domains (Ehnert, 2014;Poon & Law, 2020).”

    From Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Poon & Law, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poon, T. S.-C., & Law, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (TW)
  • Nagoya University of Commerce and Business (JP)
Corresponding author
Poon, Teresa Shuk-Ching
ORCID
Law, Kuok Kei
Venue
Human Resource Management Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
100818
ISSN
1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100818
OpenAlex
W3116210457
Cited by
88
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Human Resource Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
sustainable human resource management, paradox perspective, stakeholder needs, cognitive framing, strategy as practice, strategy making, organizational cognition, coping strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review