Cited by 72Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchSports Performance and Training

Understanding constraints on sport performance from the complexity sciences paradigm: an ecological dynamics framework

Seifert, Ludovic, Araújo, Duarte, Komar, John, Davids, Keith·2017·Human Movement Science

Abstract

Glazier's suggestion for the constraints-led approach as a GUT for sport performance is a worthy proposal. What is missing from these preliminary insights is a principled basis, in the form of pillars, for understanding the cornerstones of the sports medicine profession, and this lack of an overarching theoretical framework is also somewhat of a limitation in Glazier's initial ideas, as we argue later. Here we suggest that his preliminary proposal would benefit from considering a more comprehensive ontological positioning within the complexity sciences paradigm to benefit from conceptualising athletes and sports teams as complex adaptive systems. We argue that ecological dynamics provides a more encompassing rationale than the constraint-led approach because it is a multi-dimensional theoretical framework shaped by many relevant disciplines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.humov.2017.05.001

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Representative training designs provide learners with relevant affordances and perception-action couplings so that they become perceptually attuned to critical information sources.

    “In detail, representative training designs display three dominant notions: (1) providing learners with relevant affordances and perception-action couplings, so that they become perceptually attuned to critical information sources (e.g., Seifert et al., 2017; Orth et al., 2019);”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seifert, L., Araújo, D., Komar, J., & Davids, K.
Affiliations
  • Centre d’études des transformations des activités physiques et sportives (FR)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Corresponding author
Seifert, Ludovic
Venue
Human Movement Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
56
Issue
Pt A
Pages
178-180
ISSN
0167-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612815435
Cited by
72
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Movement Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
athletic performance, constraints-led approach, ecological dynamics, complexity science, complex adaptive systems, glaziers, theoretical framework, sports medicine, sports teams
MeSH terms
Ecology, Humans, Athletic Performance, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review