Cited by 178Global trade, sustainability, and social impactSoftware Engineering and Design PatternsInternational Business and FDI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asian firms and the restructuring of global value chains

Open access
Azmeh, Shamel, Nadvi, Khalid·2014·International Business Review

Abstract

Asian trans-national garment manufacturers are transforming the structure of global value chains in the apparel industry. Recent studies show such first tier suppliers undertaking a greater range of functional activities. In many cases, these firms originate from the so-called ‘Rising Power’ economies, particularly ‘Greater China’ and South Asia. We argue that such, transnational, Asian firms can play a pivotal and strategic role in shaping the geography and organisational restructuring of the global value chain. Drawing on secondary sources and primary research we illustrate how such firms manage complex international production linkages, and ensure the incorporation of Jordan into the global garment industry. The paper contributes to the understanding of the role of these firms and how their behaviour is driven by complex dynamics linked to their own business strategies, their linkages with buyers, and their ability to exploit production and trade opportunities while maintaining high levels of global locational flexibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.007

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–178 of 178

Metadata

Authors
Azmeh, S., & Nadvi, K.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Nadvi, Khalid
Venue
International Business Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
708-717
ISSN
0969-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128281936
Cited by
178
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6
FWCI
30.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Business Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J013234/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Development › Software Engineering and Design Patterns
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
global value chains, apparel industry, transnational firms, Asian firms, Greater China, South Asia, Jordan, buyer-supplier relationships, business strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review