The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The great dichotomy of the Solar System: Small terrestrial embryos and massive giant planet cores
Open accessAbstract
The basic structure of the Solar System is set by the presence of low-mass terrestrial planets in its inner part and giant planets in its outer part. This is the result of the formation of a system of multiple embryos with approximately the mass of Mars in the inner disk and of a few multi-Earth-mass cores in the outer disk, within the lifetime of the gaseous component of the protoplanetary disk. What was the origin of this dichotomy in the mass distribution of embryos/cores? We show in this paper that the classic processes of runaway and oligarchic growth from a disk of planetesimals cannot explain this dichotomy, even if the original surface density of solids increased at the snowline. Instead, the accretion of drifting pebbles by embryos and cores can explain the dichotomy, provided that some assumptions hold true. We propose that the mass-flow of pebbles is two-times lower and the characteristic size of the pebbles is approximately ten times smaller within the snowline than beyond the snowline (respectively at heliocentric distance r r(ice) where r(ice) is the snowline heliocentric distance), due to ice sublimation and the splitting of icy pebbles into a collection of chondrule-size silicate grains. In this case, objects of original sub-lunar mass would grow at drastically different rates in the two regions of the disk. Within the snowline these bodies would reach approximately the mass of Mars while beyond the snowline they would grow to similar to 20 Earth masses. The results may change quantitatively with changes to the assumed parameters, but the establishment of a clear dichotomy in the mass distribution of protoplanets appears robust provided that there is enough turbulence in the disk to prevent the sedimentation of the silicate grains into a very thin layer. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Less)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solar System Abundances and Condensation Temperatures of the Elements
Lodders, K. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/375492 · Cited by 4,787
Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. (1996) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190 · Cited by 3,127
The Evolution of Viscous Discs and the Origin of the Nebular Variables
Lynden-Bell, D., & Pringle, J. E. (1974) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/168.3.603 · Cited by 2,668
Hayashi, C. (1981) · Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · doi:10.1143/ptps.70.35 · Cited by 1,843
Disk frequencies and lifetimes in Young clusters
Haisch, Jr., Lada, E. A., & Lada, C. J. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/320685 · Cited by 1,723
Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. (1980) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/158356 · Cited by 1,645
Accretion and the Evolution of T Tauri Disks
Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D'Alessio, P. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305277 · Cited by 1,569
Black Holes in Binary Systems: Observational Appearances
Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. (1973) · X- and Gamma-Ray Astronomy · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-2585-0_13 · Cited by 1,503
A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration
Walsh, K. J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., O'Brien, D. P., & Mandell, A. M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10201 · Cited by 1,241
Self-citationOrigin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089010 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 13×
“If the initial mass of the embryos is this small, bringing the inner embryo to Mars-mass requires no reduction in τ inside of the snowline.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
A large planetary body inferred from diamond inclusions in a ureilite meteorite
Nabiei, F., Badro, J., Dennenwaldt, T., Oveisi, E., Cantoni, M., Hébert, C., El Goresy, A., Barrat, J.-A., & Gillet, P. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03808-6 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Morbidelli, A., Lambrechts, M., Jacobson, S., & Bitsch, B.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 258
- Pages
- 418-429
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1779392358
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The great dichotomy of the Solar System: Small terrestrial embryos and massive giant planet cores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.06.003
- The paper
- Morbidelli, A., Lambrechts, M., Jacobson, S., & Bitsch, B. (2015). The great dichotomy of the Solar System: Small terrestrial embryos and massive giant planet cores. Icarus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.06.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.