Cited by 57Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietySustainable Industrial Ecology

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Circular Manufacturing: A Systematic Literature Review

Open access
Acerbi, Federica, Forterre, Dai Andrew, Taisch, Marco·2021·IFAC-PapersOnLine

Abstract

Circular Economy (CE) empowers firms (micro-level), network of firms (meso-level), cities, regions and nations (macro-level) sustainability. CE potentialities in making regenerate resources are even greater if supported by technologies, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is gaining momentum in this regard. The extant literature presents a limited investigation of the exploitable synergies among CE and AI at the different scales of CE adoption in manufacturing, also named Circular Manufacturing (CM). Indeed, this paper entails a systematic literature review to investigate the state-of-the-art in this domain proposing future research opportunities. Among the findings, AI exploitation is advanced at micro-level, whilst the meso-level, macro-level, and the synergies among the three levels require further exploration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.040

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI can support designers by suggesting initial designs for eco-friendly products or adjusting designs based on environmental parameters and/or considerations of other actors in the circular value chain.

    “AI can support designers by suggesting initial designs for eco-friendly products or adjusting designs based on environmental parameters and/or considerations of other actors in the circular value chain (Acerbi et al. 2021;Gailhofer et al. 2021).”
  • To date, considerations of the ethical implications of using AI to achieve a transition to CE have been limited, and the potential harms from using AI for CE have not been comprehensively analysed.

    “However, to date, considerations of the ethical implications of using AI to achieve a transition to CE have been limited.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acerbi, F., Forterre, D. A., & Taisch, M.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Acerbi, Federica
  • Forterre, Dai Andrew
  • Taisch, Marco
Venue
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
367-372
ISSN
2405-8963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214597440
Cited by
57
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
artificial intelligence, circular economy, circular manufacturing, resource regeneration, sustainable manufacturing, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review