The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, incorporating SRL techniques into educational technologies and establishing empirical evidence of their effectiveness are ongoing processes, demanding further research to identify best practices and gather robust evidence on their impact on student learning outcomes (Broadbent & Poon, 2015).”
From Impact of AI assistance on student agency (2024) · cites this paper as Broadbent & Poon, 2015
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, most SRL research has focused on the face-to-face context, and evidence suggests that these impacts might be decreased online, but without more rigorous study and documentation of varied pedagogical contexts, like modality, it is impossible to make this distinction (Broadbent & Poon, 2015).”
From The Potential of Exam Wrappers in Higher Education Assessment Practice: Fostering Self-Efficacy Through Guided Self-Reflection (2025) · cites this paper as Broadbent & Poon, 2015
In the citing paper
“e findings of these studies clearly showed that there is a positive correlation between self-assessment, self-regulated learning (SRL), and self-efficacy strategies.”
From Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Multilevel analysis techniques and applications
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · Cited by 6,006
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Pintrich, P. R. (2000) · Handbook of Self-Regulation · doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 · Cited by 5,173
(2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-109890-2.x5027-6 · Cited by 4,453
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Serdyukov, 2013, Flying with clipped wings: are students independent in online college classes?, Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 6, 54
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 · Cited by 1,097
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001 · Cited by 1,003
“Prior work in online learning environments demonstrated improvements in academic achievement from applying SRL strategies, especially time management, metacognition, and effort regulation strategies (Azevedo & Aleven, 2013; Broadbent & Poon, 2015; Niemi, Nevgi, & Virtanen, 2003).”
BackgroundThe current landscape of learning analytics in higher education
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027 · Cited by 766
The Challenges of Online Learning: Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner
Gillett‐Swan, J. K. (2017) · Journal of Learning Design · doi:10.5204/jld.v9i3.293 · Cited by 751
Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004 · Cited by 712
“Similar results have also been reported elsewhere (e.g. Broadbent & Poon, 2015).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Broadbent, J.
- ORCID
- Broadbent, J.
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046127588
- Cited by
- 1,692
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 265 · 2025: 213 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 183 · 2022: 228 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Internet and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, academic performance, online higher education, virtual learning environments, time management, metacognition, effort regulation, critical thinking, rehearsal, elaboration, organizations, peer learning, student learning strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
