Cited by 19Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Implantable loop recorders detect tachyarrhythmias in symptomatic patients with negative electrophysiological studies

Paisey, John R., Yue, Arthur M., Treacher, Kenneth, Roberts, Paul R., Morgan, John M.·2005·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are a valuable tool in the investigation of syncope and compare favourably with non-invasive and intracardiac electrophysiological assessment of bradycardia. They are known to detect tachyarrhythmias but have not been shown to add to the diagnostic yield of electrophysiological testing in symptomatic patients.Methods We prospectively studied the first 41 patients (aged 48+/-19 years) in whom ILR were used at our institution after negative electrophysiological studies (EPS). All patients were symptomatic with palpitations (11), syncope (22) or both (8). Nine patients had known structural heart disease (two ischaemic, four cardiomyopathy, two valvular and one congenital). Patients were assessed according to demographic factors, symptoms and investigations. Loop recordings were analysed and assessed according to conventional criteria.Results Among 41 patients in whom electrophysiological studies had failed to demonstrate arrhythmias, six were found to have clinically significant tachyarrhythmias (four ventricular and two supraventricular).Conclusion ILR diagnose prognostically significant tachyarrhythmias in symptomatic patients with negative electrophysiological studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.06.020

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paisey, J. R., Yue, A. M., Treacher, K., Roberts, P. R., & Morgan, J. M.
Affiliations
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Paisey, John R.
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
35-38
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073789668
Cited by
19
References
18
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
implantable loop recorder, tachyarrhythmia detection, syncope, palpitations, ventricular arrhythmias, supraventricular arrhythmias, structural heart disease, diagnostic yield
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Atrial Flutter, Echocardiography, Electrodes, Implanted, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Tachycardia, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Defibrillators, Implantable, Tilt-Table Test, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review