Cited by 102Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesClinical practice guidelines implementationCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Lack of control of hypertension in primary cardiovascular disease prevention in Europe: Results from the EURIKA study

Borghi, Claudio, Tubach, Florence, De Backer, Guy, Dallongeville, Jean, Guallar, Eliseo, Medina, Jesús, Perk, Joep, Roy, Carine +3 more·2016·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background The prevalence of and factors associated with uncontrolled hypertension and apparent resistant hypertension were assessed in the European Study on Cardiovascular Risk Prevention and Management in Usual Daily Practice (EURIKA; NCT00882336).Methods EURIKA was a cross-sectional observational study including patients being treated for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in 12 European countries. Patients were assessed if they were being treated for hypertension (N=5220). Blood pressure control was defined according to European guidelines, with sensitivity analysis taking account of patients' age and diabetes status. Associated factors were assessed using multivariate analysis.Results In the primary analysis, a total of 2691 patients (51.6%) had uncontrolled hypertension. Factors significantly associated with an increased risk of having uncontrolled hypertension included female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93-2.73), body mass index (BMI; OR per kg/m(2): 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), and geographic location. A total of 749 patients (14.3%) had apparent resistant hypertension. Factors significantly associated with an increased risk of having apparent resistant hypertension included BMI (OR per kg/m(2): 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.08), diabetes (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06-1.53), use of statins (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.15-1.62), serum uric acid levels (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.09-1.23), and geographic location. Similar results were seen in sensitivity analyses.Conclusions Over 50% of patients treated for hypertension continued to have uncontrolled blood pressure and 14.3% had apparent resistant hypertension. Positive associations were seen with other cardiovascular risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.044

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borghi, C., Tubach, F., De Backer, G., Dallongeville, J., Guallar, E., Medina, J., Perk, J., Roy, C., Banegas, J. R., Rodriguez-Artalejo, F., & Halcox, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • AstraZeneca (Spain) (ES)
  • Linnaeus University (SE)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES)
  • Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Borghi, Claudio
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
218
Pages
83-88
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2378917168
Cited by
102
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
uncontrolled hypertension, resistant hypertension, blood pressure control, primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, statin use, serum uric acid, sex differences, regional variation
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review