Cited by 761Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHormonal Regulation and HypertensionSodium Intake and Health

Prevalence of Resistant Hypertension in the United States, 2003–2008

Persell, Stephen D.·2011·Hypertension

Abstract

The prevalence of resistant hypertension is unknown. Much previous knowledge comes from referral populations or clinical trial participants. Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2003 through 2008, nonpregnant adults with hypertension were classified as resistant if their blood pressure was ≥140/90 mm Hg and they reported using antihypertensive medications from 3 different drug classes or drugs from ≥4 antihypertensive drug classes regardless of blood pressure. Among US adults with hypertension, 8.9% (SE: 0.6%) met criteria for resistant hypertension. This represented 12.8% (SE: 0.9%) of the antihypertensive drug–treated population. Of all drug-treated adults whose hypertension was uncontrolled, 72.4% (SE: 1.6%) were taking drugs from <3 classes. Compared with those with controlled hypertension using 1 to 3 medication classes, adults with resistant hypertension were more likely to be older, to be non-Hispanic black, and to have higher body mass index (all P <0.001). They were more likely to have albuminuria, reduced renal function, and self-reported medical histories of coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, and diabetes mellitus ( P <0.001). Most (85.6% [SE: 2.4%]) individuals with resistant hypertension used a diuretic. Of this group, 64.4% (SE: 3.2%) used the relatively weak thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide. Although not rare, resistant hypertension is currently found in only a modest proportion of the hypertensive population. Among those classified here as resistant, inadequate diuretic therapy may be a modifiable therapeutic target. Cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and renal dysfunction were all common in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.170308

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Persell, S. D.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Persell, Stephen D.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2011-06
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1076-1080
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2160704477
Cited by
761
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 118 · 2013: 119 · 2012: 68
FWCI
70.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1k08hs015647-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
resistant hypertension, prevalence, antihypertensive drug classes, uncontrolled hypertension, diuretic therapy, hydrochlorothiazide, albuminuria, renal dysfunction, cardiovascular comorbidity, diabetes mellitus, obesity, racial disparities, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Drug Resistance, Drug Therapy, Humans, Hypertension, Nutrition Surveys, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review