Cited by 26Aortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesConnective tissue disorders researchGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Aortic size predicts aortic dissection in Turner syndrome—a 25-year prospective cohort study

Open access
Thunström, Sofia, Thunström, Erik, Naessén, Sabine, Berntorp, Kerstin, Laczna Kitlinski, Margareta, Ekman, Bertil, Wahlberg, Jeanette, Bergström, Ingrid +5 more·2023·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Women with Turner syndrome (TS) have an increased risk of aortic dissection. The current recommended cutoff to prevent aortic dissection in TS is an aortic size index (ASI) of ≥2.5 cm/m 2 . This study estimated which aortic size had the best predictive value for the risk of aortic dissection, and whether adjusting for body size improved risk prediction. Methods A prospective, observational study in Sweden, of women with TS, n = 400, all evaluated with echocardiography of the aorta and data on medical history for up to 25 years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the absolute ascending aortic diameter (AAD), ascending ASI and TS specific z-score. Results There were 12 patients (3%) with aortic dissection. ROC curves demonstrated that absolute AAD and TS specific z-score were superior to ascending ASI in predicting aortic dissection. The best cutoff for absolute AAD was 3.3 cm and 2.12 for the TS specific z-score, respectively, with a sensitivity of 92% for both. The ascending ASI cutoff of 2.5 cm/m 2 had a sensitivity of 17% only. Subgroup analyses in women with an aortic diameter ≥ 3.3 cm could not demonstrate any association between karyotype, aortic coarctation, bicuspid aortic valve, BMI, antihypertensive medication, previous growth hormone therapy or ongoing estrogen replacement treatment and aortic dissection. All models failed to predict a dissection in a pregnant woman. Conclusions In Turner syndrome, absolute AAD and TS-specific z-score were more reliable predictors for aortic dissection than ASI. Care should be taken before and during pregnancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.11.023

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The risk of aortic dissection in TS is increased in those with increased aortic diameter.

    “The risk of aortic dissection in TS is increased in those with increased aortic diameter.232”
  • The most frequently used indexing methods are the Z-score, the aortic height index (AHI), and the aortic size index (ASI).

    “The most frequently used indexing methods are the Z-score (Z, dimensionless unit indicating the number of standard deviations from the population mean), the aortic height index (AHI, aortic diameter in millimeters divided by body length in meters), and the aortic size index (ASI, aortic diameter in centimeters divided by body surface area (BSA) per square meters) (Table 12).232,233,441-443”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. P. Saenger, K.A. Wikland, G.S. Conway, M. Davenport, C.H. Gravholt, R. Hintz, O. Hovatta, M. Hultcrantz, K. Landin-Wilhelmsen, A. Lin, B. Lippe, A.M. Pasquino, M.B. Ranke, R. Rosenfeld, M. Silberbach, Fifth international symposium on Turner syndrome: recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86 (2001) 3061-3069.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thunström, S., Thunström, E., Naessén, S., Berntorp, K., Laczna Kitlinski, M., Ekman, B., Wahlberg, J., Bergström, I., Bech-Hanssen, O., Krantz, E., Laine, C. M., Bryman, I., & Landin-Wilhelmsen, K.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Hallands sjukhus Halmstad (SE)
Corresponding author
Thunström, Sofia
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
373
Pages
47-54
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4309670341
Cited by
26
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Heart and Lung Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
Turner syndrome, aortic dissection, aortic size index, ascending aortic diameter, risk prediction, coarctation of the aorta, bicuspid aortic valve, pregnancy, women
MeSH terms
Aortic Dissection, Aorta, Aortic Coarctation, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Turner Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review