Cited by 307Innovative Human-Technology InteractionChildren's Rights and ParticipationChild Development and Digital Technology

Cooperative inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design

Guha, Mona Leigh, Druin, Allison, Fails, Jerry Alan·2013·International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guha, M. L., Druin, A., & Fails, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
Corresponding author
Guha, Mona Leigh
Venue
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
14-23
ISSN
2212-8689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078250442
Cited by
307
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10
FWCI
25.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-09-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
cooperative inquiry, children as co-designers, mobile computing, social computing, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review