Cited by 37Children's Rights and ParticipationInnovative Human-Technology InteractionChild Development and Digital Technology

Inclusive or Inflexible: a Critical Analysis of the School Context in Supporting Children's Genuine Participation

Iivari, Netta, Kinnula, Marianne·2016·Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Relatively little attention has been paid to discussing what it means when children's participation in technology design is genuine, even though the importance of their participation is emphasized in the literature. School as a context presents multiple challenges but also numerous benefits for working with children. We examine five projects carried out with children in the school context, and critically consider in which respects this context supports genuine participation of children, in which respects it poses challenges for it, and what this implies for technology design with children. We maintain that researchers need to critically examine the goals set for children's participation: whether they are learning- or material outcome-oriented. This significantly affects the choice of the context for projects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2971485.2971531

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iivari, N., & Kinnula, M.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Venue
Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-10-23
Pages
1-10
OpenAlex
W2533079913
Cited by
37
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
21.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
children's participation, technology design, school context, inclusive design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review