Cited by 31Teaching and Learning ProgrammingChild Development and Digital TechnologyDigital Storytelling and Education

CyberPLAYce—A tangible, interactive learning tool fostering children’s computational thinking through storytelling

Soleimani, Arash, Herro, Danielle, Green, Keith Evan·2019·International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.01.002

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soleimani, A., Herro, D., & Green, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Kennesaw State University (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Soleimani, Arash
Venue
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
20
Pages
9-23
ISSN
2212-8689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911341033
Cited by
31
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-09-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Digital Storytelling and Education
Keywords
computational thinking, storytelling, cyber-physical interaction, children's programming, participatory design, research through design, child engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review